Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Evolution -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: GPS Info who wrote (42346)	10/5/2013 11:01:39 PM
From: Solon	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 69300

"He probably won't have the time, so you shouldn't take it as a criticism." That is reassuring... I thought of a question for you if you are comfortable sharing some of your values. If not--that is fine. Anyways, this is what I was wondering. It is a hypothetical. Your boss wants you to choose between two men to hire as a youth camp leader. She wants you to choose whichever of the two is most likely to be a good influence on the youth and most especially will be trusted not to harm the youth. In short, she wants you to select the most moral and safe candidate. You investigate and find that "Bob" had once been charged with a fraudulent investment scheme and had bilked retired people of their savings. He was never convicted, however, because of a technicality. You have seen the evidence in support of the allegations, however, and you believe that Bob did indeed deserve to be charged. "Bill" has been honored several times for his work with youth and once risked his life in entering a burning building to save some children. Which candidate will you choose? Your boss does not have a gun.