Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Pastimes : Philly Sports Thread(except soccer:) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: LTK007 who wrote (2705)	10/7/2013 4:36:19 AM
From: stormrider1	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 2749

Max, I don't want one either. Kelly was interviewed after the game and said if Vick is healthy he plays and he is our QB. The Giants had no answer to the Vick/McCoy option and defenses will have a tough time defending it. I hope Vick can at least be ready for the Dallas game; I really believe we match up much better for that game with a healthy Vick. I was impressed with Foles running the 2 minute offense to get us in field goal range at the end of the first half, especially coming in off the bench; that throw to Jackson before the half was a beautiful throw only he could catch. Foles had a rough 3rd quarter, but he really put it to them in the fourth quarter. The crossing routes run by Jackson and getting the tight ends involved really put the Giants on their heels. Our defense exposed Mannings' weakness in the second half...when he gets hurried or hit he is an interception machine. The flip side to that is give him time he is like his brother; he will pick you apart. We are fortunate to have 2 really good QB's albeit different strengths. Kelly game planned the offense perfectly for Foles strengths in the 2nd half. All that said, I am concerned for Vick's future with us at 33. He has durability problems and they won't get better at his age. I believe we will see this team improve as the year goes on...at least I have hope :) Mike