SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Tenchusatsu who wrote (744776)10/7/2013 10:21:01 PM
From: SilentZ  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 1575426
 
Doesn't sound terribly unreasonable to me.

-Z



To: Tenchusatsu who wrote (744776)10/7/2013 10:57:24 PM
From: i-node  Respond to of 1575426
 
>> Cause you know, it's expensive to live here.

I guess I don't really know what a "transit worker" does, and I know it is expensive to live in CA. But I really cannot imagine those jobs warrant anywhere near that kind of salary (presumably, there are benefits on top of it).

It has been a while since I've been to the Bay Area, but I don't remember spending an inordinate amount of money for anything there. I guess it is mostly about housing and taxes...



To: Tenchusatsu who wrote (744776)10/8/2013 12:45:52 PM
From: tejek  Read Replies (6) | Respond to of 1575426
 
Cause you know, it's expensive to live here.

It is expensive........SF and Vancouver are the two most expensive cities on the West coast.............and the West coast is the most expensive region of N. America in which to live.

Why should you make your 6 figure income while transit workers are not allowed to make a living wage? And yes, that's a living wage in the Bay area. Are you that much of an elitist?


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News