SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Tenchusatsu who wrote (744998)10/8/2013 2:58:18 PM
From: tejek  Respond to of 1576643
 
The Boston Globe takes a hard look at Republican John Boehner's reckless strategy:
JOHN BOEHNER is speaking out of both sides of his mouth. Multiple news reports on Friday had the House speaker telling fellow Republicans he would never let the nation default on its debts, which was a relief to the world. But on ABC’s “This Week” Sunday, he appeared to reverse course, telling George Stephanopoulos that “there are not the votes in the House” to increase the debt ceiling without concessions from President Obama. Boehner’s comment was a head-scratcher, because there are almost certainly enough votes to raise the debt ceiling with no conditions attached. If the chamber’s Democrats were allowed to vote, they plus as few as 17 of the 232 Republicans could spare the nation the economic catastrophe that would follow a US bond default. Almost certainly, Boehner meant there are not enough votes among Republicans alone to raise the debt ceiling. Thus, the US economy is hostage to the perverse strictures of the “Hastert rule” — the hardball strategy under which bills go forward only if most members of the speaker’s party approve, and the views of duly elected members of the minority party are barely relevant. The Founding Fathers can rest easy: They set up a workable structure. It’s Dennis Hastert, Boehner, and other recent speakers — Democrat Nancy Pelosi largely adhered to the rule, too — who’ve messed things up.




To: Tenchusatsu who wrote (744998)10/8/2013 4:14:48 PM
From: SilentZ  Respond to of 1576643
 
>I just posted an article showing how regular middle-class Bay Area residents were getting hit.

Your article has one quote from a person saying that the middle class was getting hit, along with a couple of anecdotes about it. But the statistics show that it affects a percentage of a small subset of the middle class, not the whole middle class.

I was used to spending most of the 2000s budgeting for 18% health insurance cost growth every year. That hasn't been happening lately.

You have your prediction, I have mine. Let's see where we are in 5 years -- seeing that we were both here 5 years ago, and 5 years before that, and jeez, pretty close to 5 years before that...

-Z