SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: combjelly who wrote (745614)10/10/2013 2:51:58 PM
From: TideGlider  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1577439
 
the seats were not filled during a presidential election year.



To: combjelly who wrote (745614)10/10/2013 5:46:41 PM
From: Tenchusatsu  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 1577439
 
CJ,
Why does the House have a majority of Republicans, despite Democratic candidates getting more than a million more votes that Republican ones?
I don't know where you're getting this statistic, but if true I don't think that concludes anything.

Maybe the Dem winners won by huge margins while the GOP winners won by smaller margins.

How does this relate in any way to gerrymandering?

Tenchusatsu



To: combjelly who wrote (745614)10/10/2013 7:44:42 PM
From: THE WATSONYOUTH5 Recommendations

Recommended By
FJB
joseffy
longnshort
MichaelSkyy
Tenchusatsu

  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1577439
 
Why does the House have a majority of Republicans, despite Democratic candidates getting more than a million more votes that Republican ones?

....because Democrats are highly concentrated in small geographical areas (cities)......even a dumbass libtard like you should be able to understand this....but I guess not.



To: combjelly who wrote (745614)10/11/2013 12:50:31 AM
From: i-node  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1577439
 
>> Why does the House have a majority of Republicans, despite Democratic candidates getting more than a million more votes that Republican ones? Isn't it supposed to be one man, one vote?

No. It is one House member, one vote.