SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : 2026 TeoTwawKi ... 2032 Darkest Interregnum -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: TobagoJack who wrote (103161)10/11/2013 12:11:39 AM
From: Maurice Winn  Respond to of 217666
 
It would be necessary for Made in China HK$ servers to be redundantly located everywhere, such as on each individual's cyberphone, using Qualcomm's Alljoyn, so that The Empire would not be able to incinerate the facility and thereby disrupt the flow of the New World Order cybermoney. Given the ongoing value to the US$ owners of the power to dilute umpty$trillion at about 9% a year, which is an extorquerationate royalty rate, the USA monetary authorities would not take kindly to usurpers wishing to compete in an open market. A violent response would be likely, along with cyberwar, sabotage and any and all destructive activity possible including murder. <“There is good reason Congress is concerned about providing the communist Chinese government with additional opportunities to work with the U.S. on space given their continued cyberattacks, espionage campaigns, and development of space weapons to use against the U.S.”>

It's amusing that Congress expresses such concern while Edward Snowden is having to hide in Russia [not historically associated with freedom] and Julian Assange is protected by the Ecuadorian embassy people [a banana republic]. As an innocent bystander, it seems that the USA is orders of magnitude ahead of the rest of the world in the NSA espionage and CIA cyberattack stakes. Not far ahead of other places in freedom.

Mqurice



To: TobagoJack who wrote (103161)10/11/2013 2:52:46 AM
From: Snowshoe  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 217666
 
But TJ, the exorbitant privilege is SO tempting! Surely there must be some notables among the Chinese officialdom with sufficient hubris and audacity to hatch the ultimate creature... :O)

The rise of the renminbi as international currency: Historical precedents

Jeffrey Frankel, 10 October 2011
voxeu.org

The dollar is one of three national currencies to have attained international status during the 20th century. The other two were the yen and the mark, which became major international currencies after the breakup of the Bretton Woods system in 1971-73. (The euro, of course, did so after 1999.) In the early 1990s, both were spoken of as potential rivals of the dollar for the number one slot. It is easy to forget that now, because Japan’s relative role has diminished since then and the mark has been superseded. In retrospect, the two currencies’ shares in central bank reserves peaked as the 1990s began.

The current renminbi phenomenon differs from the historical circumstances of the rise of the three earlier currencies in that the Chinese government is actively promoting the international use of its currency. This was something that neither Germany nor Japan, nor even the US, did – at least not at first. In all three cases, exporters, who stood to lose competitiveness if international demand for the currency were to rise, were much stronger than the financial sector, which might have supported internationalisation. We might expect the same fears of a stronger currency and its effects on manufacturing exports to dominate the calculations in China.

In the case of the mark and yen after 1973, internationalisation came despite the reluctance of the German and Japanese governments. In the case of the United States after 1914, a tiny elite promoted internationalisation of the dollar despite the indifference or hostility to such a project in the nation at large. These individuals, led by Benjamin Strong, the first president of the New York Fed, were the same ones who had conspired in 1910 to establish the Federal Reserve in the first place.

It is not yet clear that China’s new enthusiasm for internationalising its currency includes a willingness to end financial repression in the domestic financial system, remove cross-border capital controls, and allow the RMB to appreciate, thus helping to shift the economy away from its export-dependence. Perhaps a small elite will be able to accomplish these things, in the way that Strong did a century earlier. But so far the government is only promoting international use of the RMB offshore, walled off from the domestic financial system. That will not be enough to do it.




To: TobagoJack who wrote (103161)10/11/2013 7:25:29 PM
From: Snowshoe  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 217666
 
i am guessing that as the usd starts to implode, the planet's folks would first gather and devise a replacement, i.e. the sdr, which would quickly (w/i a year) fail, and then the monetary regime of the universe would go kaboom asunder, followed by the darkest interregnum

I'm dubious about the SDR proposal. A chimera like the euro, stitched together from the parts of multiple creatures.