Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: combjelly who wrote (745946)	10/11/2013 3:03:12 PM
From: i-node	1 Recommendation Recommended By TideGlider Respond to of 1570913

>> How would your scenario result in no investment? While someone who is pretty old might do as you say, that wouldn't be true of everyone. Let's talk about a more realistic scenario. Estate tax of 55% on gross estates over $5M. You know, redistribute the wealth. A guy I know, now in his 70s, started a business 40 years ago with nothing (he got fired from his sales job in Dallas, and said, "That will never happen again.") He had no money, but hit the ground running. Today, his business is probably worth in the range of $250M. He has two sons who are active in the business with him. He takes salary of 1.2M, the two sons take 400K/annually. The rest of the money is invested back into the business -- new warehouses, increased inventory, more salesmen, etc. I imagine they have ~500 employees -- probably half are low-wage warehouse workers. Suppose he dies tomorrow. In 18 months, his estate owes the federal government around $125M. Given this [actual, real life] scenario, you tell me how government taking the $125M helps the impoverished. Even assuming it doesn't require an immediate liquidation, at the very least it will require significant borrowing which will limit expansion of the business (unless he happens to have a $125M life insurance policy, which he obviously does not). These are the people who make up the wealth in the country -- from physicians and other professionals who accumulate a few million over their lifetimes, to business owners who have seen their businesses grow over the years.

To: combjelly who wrote (745946)	10/11/2013 3:05:07 PM
From: tejek	Respond to of 1570913

* In Texas, Senate Minority Whip John Cornyn (R) is worried enough about support from his far-right base that he's running his first batch of re-election ads with this tagline: "Conservative Like Texas." The campaign is investing "several hundred thousand dollars" as part of this initial ad buy. * And while Senate candidates' quarterly fundraising reports are generally not terribly interesting, Georgia's Michelle Nunn (D) has raised $1.7 million since kicking off her campaign in July, which is kind of amazing given that she's in a "red" state and she isn't an incumbent. Nunn has no primary opponent, and the GOP field is crowded. In other words, keep an eye on this one.