SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Liberalism: Do You Agree We've Had Enough of It? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Kenneth E. Phillipps who wrote (160796)10/15/2013 4:46:03 PM
From: TideGlider3 Recommendations

Recommended By
John
locogringo
Sedohr Nod

  Respond to of 224749
 
Most are illegal aliens and people who already applied for welfare.



To: Kenneth E. Phillipps who wrote (160796)10/15/2013 6:55:40 PM
From: lorne4 Recommendations

Recommended By
John
locogringo
ManyMoose
TideGlider

  Respond to of 224749
 
Kenny...you being an expert economist can you explain to me just how this administration can pay the debt by borrowing more money. Does not borrowing create More debt?



To: Kenneth E. Phillipps who wrote (160796)10/15/2013 7:00:07 PM
From: Sedohr Nod6 Recommendations

Recommended By
dave rose
locogringo
lorne
slowmo
TideGlider

and 1 more member

  Respond to of 224749
 
Medicaid enrollment soars in your state?....but...but you guys have that wonderful high minimum wage that you are always bragging about, wouldn't those good wages disqualify you for Medicaid?

Ooops, I forgot that you have to have a job to get those wages and even better to have one that is full time, like back in the days before B.O.

At least you can smoke pot freely on the court house steps....luckily, being a lazy POS is one of those pre existing conditions that gets covered under Obamacare.



To: Kenneth E. Phillipps who wrote (160796)10/15/2013 7:02:27 PM
From: lorne3 Recommendations

Recommended By
John
locogringo
TideGlider

  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 224749
 
Now I wonder why Hussein Obama would do this? Thought it was only third world dictators who did this so they have absolute power...gees wonder if Hussein Obama wants this kind of power...naw.

Obama’s War on American Generals

February 19, 2013
By Daniel Greenfield
frontpagemag.com

During the Bush administration there were only two American commanders of the International Security Assistance Force in Afghanistan. Under Obama there have so far been five. There has been a new ISAF commander nearly every single year that Obama has been in office. The only exception is 2012 when Obama was too busy trying to win an election to bother further sabotaging a losing war.

The parade of musical chair generals began when Obama demanded the resignation of General McKiernan. The Washington Post called the firing of a wartime commander a “rare decision.” It was the first time since the days of General Douglas MacArthur that a four-star commanding general had been purged during a war.



The decision may have been rare, but it was not unexpected. General McKiernan was fired for the same offense that General McArthur had been targeted during the Korean War: He had demanded competency from an incompetent Democrat.

McKiernan had embarrassed Obama by demanding more troops to fight the war. The situation came to a head as General McKiernan pressed an indecisive Obama to make a decision. It was a devastating scene for an administration which had covered its pivot away from Iraq with concern trolling about winning in Afghanistan. The troops would be delivered, but McKiernan would pay the price.

General McKiernan’s firing was put down to the need for fresh ideas. McKiernan was deemed too “old school” because he wanted to fight an old-fashioned war against the Taliban while Obama Inc. believed that the war couldn’t be won by beating the Taliban, but by winning the hearts and minds of Afghans. It was a fashionable and doomed strategy that required sacrificing the lives and limbs of thousands of American soldiers to political correctness.

The old-school general who had once said, “I don’t understand ever putting your men and women in harm’s way, without their having the full ability to protect themselves. That also means operating on actionable intelligence to defeat insurgents, and protect your forces. That’s how you keep your soldiers alive,” was clearly not the man for that job.

Replacing him as ISAF commander was General McChrystal. McChrystal was everything that McKiernan wasn’t. He was hip fresh blood. He voted for Obama, listened to the right music and was a big fan of counterinsurgency. He hooked up with Greg Mortenson and handed out copies of Three Cups of Tea to his staff. The book proved to be a fraud and so did the COIN strategy for winning over the Afghans.

American soldiers were prevented from defending themselves to avoid offending the Afghans and the war was not moving forward. McChrystal claimed that he had presented a plan to Washington for defeating the Taliban, but Washington only wanted their capabilities degraded. The relationship between McChrystal and Obama also degraded, and McChrystal was fired over a negative Rolling Stone article that revealed that the ISAF commander held Obama and his cronies in contempt.

Urgently, Obama swapped out General McChrystal for General Petraeus, a former enemy now turned wartime ally. In only two years, Obama had gone through three generals and fired two wartime four-star generals, setting a new record for mismanaging a war.

Petraeus’s move from Central Command to commanding the ISAF was unprecedented and did not last long. With the Taliban undefeated and the conflict shifting from a military war to a campaign of drone strikes and targeted assassinations, General Petraeus shifted over to the CIA to command the new fallback position of the war effort as Director Petraeus. But a year later, Petraeus met the same fate as McKiernan and McChrystal after alienating the CIA top brass which enmeshed him in a scandal. It did not help matters any that Republicans were salivating over the idea of a Petraeus candidacy in 2016.



Petraeus had been replaced by General Allen, who became enmeshed in the same scandal, and the confirmation hearings of his replacement, General Dunford, were sped up. This month, Dunford has taken command of an ISAF in retreat as Afghanistan has become the new Iraq. And Dunford has become the fifth ISAF commander under Obama. Of his four predecessors, all have ended their careers under a cloud.

The War in Afghanistan has been lost and so have the careers of most of its commanders. Obama has constantly swapped out generals, and unlike the rotating allied ISAF commanders during the Bush era, many of them were fired because they threatened Obama politically in some way.

The record is an ugly one, but it is not limited to the war theater in Afghanistan. After the Benghazi disaster, General Carter Ham of AFRICOM was reportedly edged out after telling a Republican Congressman that he had not received any requests for support. His replacement, General Rodriguez, had earlier taken over part of McKiernan’s job after Obama had forced him out.

More recently General Mattis, the commander of United States Central Command, Petraeus’s old job, was booted out without even a personal phone call for being too hawkish about Iran. The insult was unprecedented and the reason was the same. Like McKiernan and McChrystal, Mattis had offended important people in the Obama administration. And for that he paid the price.

General Dempsey, the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs, exemplifies the costs of career survival in the age of Obama. Dempsey echoes everything that the civilians tell him. He never disagrees with them in public and likely not in private. Whatever new gimmick comes out of the White House, whether it’s Green Energy or homosexuality, he’s right there behind it and out in front of it.

Dempsey has no ideas of his own and he doesn’t need any. He has nothing to bring to the table except a willingness to act as Obama’s pet parrot in a uniform. When McChrystal first met Obama, he recalled thinking that Obama was “uncomfortable and intimidated” by the room full of military brass. That observation helped get McChrystal fired and these days it’s the military brass that feels uncomfortable and intimidated by Obama Inc.



To: Kenneth E. Phillipps who wrote (160796)10/15/2013 7:54:21 PM
From: lorne4 Recommendations

Recommended By
John
locogringo
ManyMoose
slowmo

  Respond to of 224749
 
Poor Phil Griffin: Nielsen Verifies Fox News Ratings Jump
By Andrew Johnson
October 15, 2013
nationalreview.com

Last week, MSNBC president Phil Griffin called for an investigation after Fox News’ night-to-night ratings jump for its new lineup, saying it was “impossible.” According to the Nielsen Company, which collects the ratings, it’s not.

Nielsen conducted an investigation of the numbers and found, despite Griffin’s doubts, they were accurate. He had questioned how Fox News’ new primetime line-up nearly doubled its audience in the key 25–54 demographic between its debut last Monday night and Tuesday.

The network’s new 9 p.m. show, The Kelly File, fell to its MSNBC counterpart, The Rachel Maddow Show, on Monday night, but then its ratings jumped 116 percent. “You guys should be doing some investigations,” Griffin said last week. “I have never seen it in all my years of cable — same overnight, same everything. And they doubled their ratings in a day? It is impossible.”

The two other recently moved Fox News program, On the Record with Greta Van Susteren at 7 p.m. and Hannity at 10 p.m., also saw significant increases in viewership on Tuesday night after losing to or tying MSNBC the previous night.



To: Kenneth E. Phillipps who wrote (160796)10/15/2013 8:47:22 PM
From: locogringo5 Recommendations

Recommended By
Honey_Bee
John
ManyMoose
slowmo
TideGlider

  Read Replies (5) | Respond to of 224749
 
Kennedy, let me fill you in with a little known secret. I just spent 55 hours in a local hospital with my wife. (who is doing fine)

If you want great care in the hospital, even with medicare, leave FOXNEWS on the flat screen tv all day. That lets the staff, nurse and doctors know who you are and what you think.

Let me tell you...........kenny_troll.............they are NOT a bit happy. Nurses hours are being cut and part timers may actually lose benefits. There are more part timers than full timers. Imagine that!!!

Hours being cut, duties being expanded.................and when the freeloaders come in DEMANDING equal care, I submit there will be mass resignations. Believe it.

The hospitals will then be staffed by the same quality workers as the post office and the mass transit unions.

Good luck with that.

I'm going to order my black pill tonight. That kind of care is not for me.



To: Kenneth E. Phillipps who wrote (160796)10/15/2013 9:52:02 PM
From: lorne4 Recommendations

Recommended By
John
locogringo
slowmo
TideGlider

  Respond to of 224749
 
Obama's War on Christians: AFA called 'hate group'

Soldiers ordered not to affiliate with pro-family organization
Bob Unruh
Tuesday, October 15, 2013
wnd.com

The U.S. military already had been caught teaching that the Founding Fathers, whose beliefs and political positions could accurately be described in today’s terminology as conservative, were “extremists.”

And according to a study at the West Point Military Academy, those who make up that right-wing segment in society constitute a danger to the U.S.

Then it was revealed that a far-left organization that was caught providing information to a terrorist later convicted of a domestic attack was “advising” the U.S. Department of Homeland Security.

But it wasn’t really until this week’s revelation by Todd Starnes on Fox News that U.S. Army soldiers at a Mississippi base were being instructed that the the American Family Association is a “hate group” were there charges that the man at the top of the military food chain was at fault. The Army used taxpayer funds to classify pro-family organizations as “hate groups” and ordered uniformed personnel to avoid any affiliation with them.

Brian Fischer, the director of issues analysis for the American Family Association, told WND the government’s hostility is rooted entirely in the groups’ opposition to same-sex marriage and open homosexuality in the military. The AFA also asserts that the Obama administration is using the list of “hate groups” compiled by the Southern Poverty Law Center, a radical leftist group.

Fischer’s interview with WND can be heard below:


Fischer cited Starnes’ report in writing, “If our military wasn’t headed by a commander in chief who is hostile to Christian faith, these allegations would be laughed off every military base in the world.”

He said the act of linking the organization to hate simply because it adheres to the biblical teachings about homosexuality, something that is done routinely by that above-mentioned far-left organization, the SPLC, is simply unjustified.

“The truth is that AFA doesn’t hate anyone. We love everybody. We love homosexuals enough to tell them the truth about the moral, spiritual and physical dangers of homosexual conduct,” he wrote in a commentary on the exploding controversy involving the U.S. military.

“Our first commander in chief, George Washington, was flatly opposed to the normalization of homosexuality in the military, dismissing two soldiers who were caught in the act. And his language was quite strong. Referring to the ‘attempt to commit sodomy,’ Washington expressed ‘abhorrence and detestation of such infamous crimes.’”

Fischer said he’s also heard from various sources that many Christian members of the military do not plan to re-enlist because of the crackdown on religious freedom by the federal government.

“Those that are strong in their faith, strong believers in Christ and in Christianity and in the values that made America great, they are the heart and soul of the American military,” he said. “If we start losing them, that really is going to weaken our military and that will ultimately be the biggest threat to our national security.”

President Obama worked aggressively to rid the U.S. military of a ban on openly displaying homosexual behavior – as well as a number of other moves to promote homosexuality throughout the rest of society.

“In an effort to appease Muslims, President Obama once said, ‘We reject all efforts to denigrate the religious beliefs of others,’” Fischer noted.

“Mr. President, it’s time for you to start practicing what you preach; stop denigrating Christians in your own country.”

In a video interview on American Family Radio, AFA President Tim Wildmon also blamed the top of the power structure for the problem.

There are “far left ideologues in the Obama administration, and in charge at the Pentagon and at the Justice Department,” he said. That’s who is getting such materials sent out to the military bases.

Officials at the Pentagon, as well as Army headquarters there, declined to respond to WND requests for comment on the issue.

But the Starnes report detailed what happened this time in the latest in a long string of attacks by the U.S. military under Obama on those with a Christian faith.

He reported it was during a briefing at Camp Shelby in Mississippi that officials listed the AFA with the KKK, the Black Panthers and the Nation of Islam as a domestic hate group.

A soldier ordered to attend the briefing had contacted Starnes about the seminar’s content.

video..
<script height="506px" width="900px" src="http://player.ooyala.com/iframe.js#pbid=29c9fd42b6564348812f1c7d4ff9252d&ec=0zN2t2ZjpLHf8NclQn3ukUcacQBfUMUA"></script>

“I had to show Americans what our soldiers are now being taught,” the soldier, whose identity was withheld, said. “I couldn’t just let this one pass.”

The soldier said the presenter remained adamant in his condemnation of the AFA even though he was challenged by a chaplain, and then suggested soldiers could be penalized for supporting the AFA.

A part of the issue appears to be the connections between the government and the SPLC, which was linked to domestic terrorism in a recent attack in Washington.

The organization, which has adopted the position that any criticism of or opposition to homosexuality is based on “hate,” was identified by convicted terrorist Floyd Lee Corkins as the source of his information that the Family Research Council was a “hate group” for its opposition to homosexuality.

He admitted to investigators he picked FRC to attack because the organization was listed as an “anti-gay” hate group by the Southern Poverty Law Center on its website.

FRC promotes traditional Judeo-Christian beliefs about the family and homosexuality, but SPLC claims the organization’s “real specialty is defaming gays and lesbians.”

Corkins, a former volunteer at an LGBT community center, pleaded guilty to terrorism.

On Aug. 15, 2012, a heavily armed Corkins walked into FRC headquarters and began shooting with the intention of killing “as many people as I could.” He managed to shoot and injure just one person, facilities manager Leo Johnson, who is credited with heroically stopping the attack.

The SPLC was quickly tagged as a source of the damaging allegation in the AFA’s case.

“The blatantly false ‘hate’ allegation is coming from the Southern Poverty Law Center, which is now a thoroughly discredited source on any subject, especially hate,” Fischer wrote. “In fact, for spreading malicious lies about pro-family groups, SPLC belongs on its own hate group list. They’ve made a despicable career out of using lies, distortions and innuendo to whip up reckless and dangerous animosity against groups which defend the values of the Founders. … The real hate group here is the SPLC…”

The Obama administration’s attacks on conservatives date back to just weeks after he took office.

At that time a newly unclassified Department of Homeland Security report warned against the possibility of violence by unnamed “right-wing extremists” including those who oppose abortion.

That had followed by only days a report from the Missouri Information Analysis Center that warned law enforcement officials to watch out for individuals with “radical” ideologies based on Christian views.

Officials with the DHS later told WND they would refuse to identify the actual authors of the report, or comment on any actions taken in response to the controversy.

But the steady drumbeat of statements from the administration even prompted members of both parties in Congress to blast the comments.

The Department of Defense later was caught teaching that those who oppose abortion are “low-level terrorists.”

It was only weeks after all of this developed that the SPLC confirmed to WND it published a report and delivered it to law enforcement officers across the nation that lumped those who are dedicated to the constitutional principles on which the nation was founded alongside crazed killers.

It then was revealed the SPLC was advising DHS formally on how to “combat violent extremism” and the DHS was caught monitoring a blog posted by a Christian who was forced to flee Brazil because of the conflict between that nation’s pro-homosexual “hate crimes” agenda and his advocacy for traditional marriage.”

The Obama administration declined comment on its decision to monitor Julio Severo’s unabashedly Christian Last Days Watchman blog.

The statements continued. Early this year a West Point study from the U.S. Military Academy’s Combating Terrorism Center linked opposition to abortion and other “fundamental” positions to terrorism.

The study, “Challenges from the Sidelines: Understanding America’s Violent Far-Right,” cites “anti-abortionists” as an active threat for terrorist activity.

“The anti-abortionists have been extremely productive during the last two decades, amassing 227 attacks, many of them perpetrated without the responsible perpetrators identified or caught,” author Arie Perliger wrote. “And while, in both cases, the 1990s were more violent than the last decade, in the case of anti-abortion, the trend is much more extreme, as 90 percent of attacks were perpetrated before 2001.”

American Life League President Judie Brown called it a smear tactic.

“I can see exactly what is going on with reference to the pro-life movement. The use of two words expose the bias and hatred for what we stand for as a movement. Those words are ‘attacks’ and ‘violence’,” Brown said.

Herb Titus, a constitutional law professor, former dean of the Regent University School of Law and distinguished fellow with the Inter-American Institute for Philosophy, Government, and Social Thought, says it’s an attempt to link conservative thought with violence.

“Professor Perliger has adopted the strategy of many left-wing members of the professoriate, concentrating on the behavior of a few in order to discredit many who hold similar views but who do not engage in any form of violence,” Titus said.

“His theory is that of the iceberg, that which as seen may be small, but it hides what is a much larger threat just below the surface. Obviously, the professor disagrees with those who favor small government, cutting back of federal government encroachments upon the powers of the state and to discredit this movement focuses on a few gun-toting militia,” Titus said.

Titus turns his attention to who he believes is the source of the study.

“Like so many in the Obama administration, Perliger does not want to engage in any dialogue on the issues, but just discredit an entire political movement by ad hominem charged words,” Titus said. “Perliger is not a serious scholar, but a propagandist for the existing regime.”

The military teaching that the colonists were “extremists” was traced back to the SPLC.

Judicial Watch, a government corruption monitor, said it got records regarding the “preparation and presentation of training materials on hate groups or hate crimes distributed or used by the Air Force.”

The documents claimed, “In U.S. history, there are many examples of extremist ideologies and movements. The colonists who sought to free themselves from British rule and the Confederate states who sought to secede from the Northern states are just two examples.”

The 9/11 attacks by Muslims who killed nearly 3,000 people are called a “historical event.”



To: Kenneth E. Phillipps who wrote (160796)10/16/2013 10:56:14 AM
From: longnshort1 Recommendation

Recommended By
John

  Respond to of 224749
 
According to a report from Ed Klein author of Obama biography The Amateur, Obama adviser Valerie Jarrett was the "architect" of the government shutdown showdown. She developed the strategy to force a showdown with Republicans over ObamaCare as part of a plan to regain Democratic control of the House in 2014.

Jarret is called "the night stalker" by some White House staffers because she is the only aide who regularly goes upstairs to the White House residence and "hangs" with the entire Obama family.
It was Jarrett who advised Obama that voters would mostly blame Republicans if the federal government ground to a halt, providing a golden opportunity to swing back control of the House to Democrats in the 2014 mid-term elections, according to Klein.

A Democratic House would give Obama an opportunity to pass immigration and other legislation blocked by the current Republican majority.

“It was during one of those nightly sessions that Jarrett devised the no-negotiating strategy that Obama has employed in his fight with the GOP over the government shutdown,” Klein said, citing sources within the administration.

“Valerie came up with the concept late at night, after the kids and grandma and were gone.”

“She convinced the president that a government shutdown and default offered a great opportunity to demonize the Republicans and help the Democrats win back a majority in the House of Representatives in 2014 .
Valerie also came with the idea of using the words `hostage’, and `ransom,’ and `terrorists’ against the Republicans,’” Klein said.With her proximity to Obama and his family Jarret has more influence on the President than any of his other advisers.
“Everyone in the Beltway knew Valerie Jarrett was influential. They didn’t know how influential she was,” said Klein, who interviewed more than a half dozen White House and former presidential advisers about the shutdown strategy.Jarrett is the one who advised Obama “do not cooperate one iota on ObamaCare. Don’t given an inch. Let the Republicans stew in their own juice,“ Klein said.

“The Republicans walked into a trap set up by Valerie Jarrett and President Obama, The Republicans are in an untenable position,” he added.
Throughout the administration there have been reports of Jarret's influence on this President, the raid on Usama Bin Laden comes to mind where it was reported that Jarrett got Obama to delay the action three times before it was finally executed.

In the end the decision/blame to go or not go ahead with Obama's stubbornness strategy can only be placed with one person the President. And it will be 13 months before we can judge whether or not it worked from his point of view.



To: Kenneth E. Phillipps who wrote (160796)10/17/2013 4:21:21 PM
From: longnshort3 Recommendations

Recommended By
John
Sedohr Nod
TideGlider

  Respond to of 224749
 

CONFIDENCE RESTORED: CHINESE DOWNGRADE US CREDIT RATING....
DEBT UNLIMITED!