Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : Tech Stock Options -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Nemer who wrote (30714)	12/9/1997 1:04:00 PM
From: ViperChick Secret Agent 006.9	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 58727

Well the point held with no buffer...with a little buffer after the 15 miuntes...so we shall see... no grilling on this one, yet. i understand it. but look out when I don't! THE G.Q. CaT Babe

To: Nemer who wrote (30714)	12/9/1997 1:10:00 PM
From: Tom Trader	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 58727

Hi Nemer re >>Help me, I tried to help you when the grill queen gets going........<< I know what you mean....and to think that someone once called ME an inquisitor!!! The one thing that one must acknowledge though, is that K Rose does ask very pertinent questions. I don't know whether you understood my point re the SPX vs the OEX -- basically, although I don't know the ingredients that make up your system, what I was trying to say is that if the split in the OEX has distorted things, you'll probably find that using the SPX as an alternative will work just as well as an alternative for the signals on the OEX. On my system once the SPX generates a signal it invariably means that the OEX has done so as well.

To: Nemer who wrote (30714)	12/9/1997 2:16:00 PM
From: Kevin	Respond to of 58727

>>>-Help me, I tried to help you when the grill queen gets going........ha ha ha<<< ROFLMAO! Hi Nemer. I'll try, but I'm having some problems myself <<<g>>> Hope you had a good weekend.