SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : View from the Center and Left -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: JohnM who wrote (235048)10/17/2013 9:12:58 PM
From: JohnM  Respond to of 542147
 
That last bit, the pdf file, led me to spend a moment on a google search. I'm finding what I thought to be the case. Here's the first paragraph of a Pew report.

Research shows that attending high-quality pre-kindergarten has a lasting impact on a child’s success both in school and in life. Leading economists find that investing dollars in high-quality pre-k yields significant returns. Armed with this growing body of evidence, many states have increased funding for pre-kindergarten in recent years, but there is more work to be done. More than 75 percent of the nation’s four-year-olds and an e - See more at: pewtrusts.org



To: JohnM who wrote (235048)10/18/2013 11:48:47 AM
From: Bread Upon The Water  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 542147
 
Ok--that will probably give me enough to chew on.

Here's the thing though--if we want to provide free child pre-school care to poor families let's just be up front about it and debate that, politically (the legislature--not you and I) as a policy issue along with the cost of such.

Let's not entangle that issue in conflicting studies about whether pre-school has good, or any, measurable, educational benefits.

And that is how I feel about it in NC as well. I feel this an attempt by the universal pre-scool supporters to back door the issue through judicial activism rather than debate the "pros" and "cons" of such in the legislature.