Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Naxos Resources (NAXOF) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: B.D.Bauden who wrote (6731)	12/9/1997 2:10:00 PM
From: Lorne S. C.	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 20681

Anybody have any idea as to why Naxos is down to 6.25 x 6.75? Does it have something to do with comments made by liontamer, and therefore the results are not what we are expecting? Lorne S. Cohen

To: B.D.Bauden who wrote (6731)	12/9/1997 2:21:00 PM
From: Jerry in Omaha	Respond to of 20681

Mr. Bauden; You wrote; "You can not come into a forum such as this and slander people. Companies like BD and Ledeoux live off of their reputations. JJ and all the other people associated with NAXOF shouldn't have to tolerate being accused of criminal activity just so HungryLion can make a few bucks." If what you say is true I couldn't agree with you more. It seems Naxos has a "stealth hit-man" that's not just using rubber bullets. Unless, of course, those bullets were cryogenically frozen. That would explain the lethal effect we have seen. But remember, it may just cost another $125 and new ISP before we see the "banished" one again. So what have we gained besides a wallet drain? Our un-named assassin's efforts may have been futile here in cyber-land. Jerard P

To: B.D.Bauden who wrote (6731)	12/9/1997 3:52:00 PM
From: sh	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 20681

I'm sorry Bruce, I couldn't disagree with you more. It is an issue of free speech! If HL is defaming anyone, then whoever he is defaming will have a good lawsuit against him (although it may be worthless depending on his financial situation). They can even try and get an injunction against his continued defamatory remarks (someone was able to do that regarding, I believe, some Arizona government officials on the IPMCF thread). However, for us or SI to start picking and choosing who we like and dislike and make a decision on whether or not to yank the person off the thread for their unpopular opinions is extremely bad policy IMHO. Maybe HL is right, the company is a fraud. Maybe everything he said about everyone was accurate. Maybe. . . . I don't believe any of his crap but I'm willing to live with it rather than forcibly removing him for his unpopular views and unsubstantiated assertions. Whose next in line, those who don't give out their e-mail addresses? With all that said, I did get a kick out of his caged comments on the Yahoo forum. Best regards, sh