SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Microcap & Penny Stocks : Rocky Mountain Int'l (OTC:RMIL former OTC:OVIS) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Hawkmoon who wrote (25246)12/9/1997 1:59:00 PM
From: Jack of All Trades  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 55532
 
"Notice that neither Pugs or Riley are willing to mention if they have sold any of their shares???"

Ron,

Just a few posts ago Pugs stated that he had not sold even one of his RMIL shares!!

JeffG



To: Hawkmoon who wrote (25246)12/9/1997 2:14:00 PM
From: Rich_1  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 55532
 
Ron, why must you be so nasty? Why must you be so concerned whether Riley and Pugs are shareholders? They would not be wasting their time posting like you are if they weren't. We all know that you are not a long shareholder. However, your behavior is that of a short. Once again, thank you for reminding us of the tremendous shorts in this stock.

Rich_1



To: Hawkmoon who wrote (25246)12/10/1997 3:27:00 AM
From: shades  Respond to of 55532
 
As for someone else's remark that I admit there is a short position, I really have no way of knowing. However, Morks lawsuit against RMIL is fairly indicative that he may be on the wrong side.

Also the fact that several have come here for the SOLE prpose to SLAM this stock and shake shares lose, do you notice how when the FINANCE is coming these NAYS fall out if the woodwork, how much math does it take to put 2 and 2 together?

What you don't seem to be grasping, however, is that mmkrs set the price of a stock based upon demand for the stock. If there is no demand for the stock, relatively few sell orders can cause them to drop the price to a level where buying interest again develops.

Buying interest is lacking because no one believes in the BS that the Cartel is spouting. Squeezing any "shorts" in a fundamentally bankrupt company like RMIL would merely cause the price to jump for a short period whereupon the "shorts" would just hop back into their short positions knowing their is no fundamental reason to stay long catching the unwary folks who bought in at the top (like $3 1/2 - 4/share) to be left holding the bag.


The mm's and shorts know that the individual investors division and fear and GREED will work against them, they toss a few crumbs out, let the GREEDY investor cover or FEARFUL investor get out and thus divide us, SQUEEZES do not involve fundmentals, they have no place in the laws of supply and demand. Look here www.shortbusters.com, Several investors here have already admitted they sold on the highs and bought on the dips, they only hurt the rest of us who are here for the BIG money, if we were all UNIFIED LEGALLY so we would not have to second guess what everyone else is doing we would be a powerful force, why do I need to have the frustration of a weak investor like Matty who for either fear, or emotion or greed, releases a huge amount of shares (he claims) back to them allowing them to cover at a much cheaper price, and therefore hurting me, the investor who is willing to wait for the BIG money, you are right, if enough weak investors sell out for whatever reason, they MM's will not have to cover or have already covered and we are left holding the bag( although I believe the Short position in RMIL is so huge that even a few weak investors with big positions will not hurt us), we need to UNIFY our might in a LEGALLY binding way so that we do not fight each other, woould you not agree? How about you MIKE, as an admitted short seller would this not scare you if some investors got together and could not be shaken from their position becasue they were LEGALLY BOUND to enter and exit a stock together instead og a bunch of promises.