Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : American Presidential Politics and foreign affairs -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: TimF who wrote (67401)	10/19/2013 10:56:27 AM
From: LLCF	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 71588

Of course... maybe you didn't "get" that my little "study" was a spooof!! LOL It was OFF TOPIC... as was YOURS!! You didn't read the rest of the post apparently... no go back like a good little scientists and see what the rest of the post said. You know Tim, as I've noted before, it's good to take whole quotes and use context, otherwise you tend to go off in non-sensical directions... which you clearly have here. Now, here... notice the original point: Message 29170814 NONE of your "data" (nor mine) has anything to do with his point or my retort... that his ban was unreasonable... NOTHING in your "study" had ANYTHING to DO with reasonable or unreasonable banning... With our studies one can conjure up all sorts or reasons why there SHOULD or SHOULD NOT be more bans on any particular type of thread. You want to hear some??? ROFLMAO DAK