SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: combjelly who wrote (749131)10/24/2013 12:57:50 PM
From: i-node1 Recommendation

Recommended By
FJB

  Respond to of 1573952
 
By law it has to be invested in US debt.

That's not the point. The point is they are running deficits. It doesn't matter where you put the money if there is nowhere near enough to pay the benefits.



To: combjelly who wrote (749131)10/24/2013 1:13:56 PM
From: TideGlider  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 1573952
 
The money when received goes directly into the US Treasury from the people and employers. It is then paid to beneficiaries of the SS system. If there is an excess it is issued back to the SS system in the form of US Treasuries. The government loans it to itself.

In the future, when it comes time to start drawing on the collected surplus, the government will pay itself back through tax revenue (or additional borrowing). The Social Security system will start cashing in the bonds, and the government will have to make good on them with tax revenue. That sounds weird because it is weird -- Whether or not it will work is a source of significant debate right now. The effect it will have is that it will shift the payment of Social Security benefits over to the government as a whole. The government as a whole, rather than the Social Security system, will have to repay the treasury bonds that the Social Security system will be cashing in. It will certainly be interesting to see what happens!

Not so sue that hasn't occurred already.