SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Corel Corp. -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Mr. Bean who wrote (3805)12/9/1997 4:08:00 PM
From: Leo Mitkievicz  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 9798
 
Bean:

We are pretty much on same wavelength. I was never involved in the lawsuit because my losses during the timeframe of eligibility were minimal. Vanni was involved, but in much the same position as I. Purchase of the stock had to be within that narrow window from August through Cowpland's pump-and-dump. I include the point simply as another possible negative overhanging the stock price. Vanni, as you must have realized, was trying to draw in some of the eligible shareholders.

Re accounting. I want to see formal changes in the way revenue is recognized. As long as they count sales when the product is shipped, then the potential for the same old manipulation continues. I don't think that O'Riley can do this on his own.

Re authorities. If they are not considering action, then shame on them.

Leo




To: Mr. Bean who wrote (3805)12/9/1997 5:19:00 PM
From: Kashish King  Respond to of 9798
 
I think you're right old bean, but a few bites here should be relatively painless should it tank even more. If you have some spare cash, such a tanking will be just as much of a buying opportunity to those already in and might even be the best thing in the long run.


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News