Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: SilentZ who wrote (750185)	10/29/2013 3:05:01 PM
From: Tenchusatsu	1 Recommendation Recommended By gamesmistress Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 1575189

Z, But that .5% losing their existing plans (the vast majority of whom will end up with other plans that they don't have to pay the difference for, if they're more expensive at all), pales in comparison to the 5-10% or even more that didn't have it before who get it. The primary reason for those 0.5% losing their existing plans is that they aren't comprehensive (i.e. expensive) enough to meet the ObamaCare requirements (and of course don't meet the grandfathering requirement). Their costs are going up. Meanwhile, the sudden increase in demand for health services will obviously cause prices to go up. I vaguely remember some provisions in ObamaCare to try and control those prices, but I think they will be woefully inadequate, especially since the whole health care structure in America is incredibly complex. That means we all will end up paying more for ObamaCare. Answer this for me. Why else do you think a primary goal is to try and get the so-called "Young Invincibles" to sign up for health insurance that most of them feel they won't need? It's to offset the costs of the less-than-healthy new patients coming into the system. I've already posted one example of this assumption not holding in a California-based experiment. Kind of silly to ignore that lesson and believe that health care costs will simply go down thanks to the ObamaCare mandate. Tenchusatsu

To: SilentZ who wrote (750185)	10/29/2013 3:08:32 PM
From: longnshort	4 Recommendations Recommended By Brumar89 simplicity Tenchusatsu TideGlider Respond to of 1575189

NBC News’s investigative team reported Monday that up to three quarters of the 14 million Americans who buy insurance on the individual market can expect their coverage to be canceled by next year because of the law’s minimum coverage requirements. NBC said that the administration has known since July 2010 that at least 40 to 67 percent of customers would not be able to keep their policies, it has always been about getting the country to go single payer, the libs knew they couldn't do it all at once, so they used incrementalism, like they do with all their plans to control people