SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : BuSab -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: SmoothSail who wrote (20883)10/31/2013 1:46:03 PM
From: Augustus Gloop1 Recommendation

Recommended By
Justin C

  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 23934
 
I didn't read the article but the headline isn't totally wrong.

We looked aggressive and undiplomatic yesterday.

Standard response should be - "we don't think this is the way to go and we don't think people will save money for a variety of reasons. We believe there are other, less expensive options that we can offer the uninsured. The ideas were presented and rejected in 2009. If our concerns come to pass we believe we need to re-visit Obamacare after the '14 elections."

Leave it alone. Let it fail and let the court of public opinion rule next Nov. after the dust settles



To: SmoothSail who wrote (20883)11/1/2013 12:16:54 PM
From: Neeka  Respond to of 23934
 
The adjectives these partisan "journalists" use are all the low/no information voters need to carry on. Notice how many in the comments section jumped on board and parroted the party line. Republicans could have fallen at her feet and wrapped Sebelius in warm fuzzy blankets, and Milbank would have found a way to disparage their actions.


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News