SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: puborectalis who wrote (751092)11/4/2013 12:22:04 AM
From: i-node2 Recommendations

Recommended By
FJB
TideGlider

  Read Replies (3) | Respond to of 1578214
 
>> and a GM car cost then under $2000......what's your point?

My point, which you helped make, is that the inordinate increase in the cost of medical care started on July 31, 1965.



To: puborectalis who wrote (751092)11/4/2013 8:55:54 AM
From: D.Austin2 Recommendations

Recommended By
FJB
TideGlider

  Respond to of 1578214
 
If I may !
In the book - Coming Apart by Charles Murray
First chapter, Our Kind of People - Page 27
1963 priced in 2010 dollars . . .
gas $2.16,dozen eggs $3.92, gallon of milk $3.49, chicken $2.06 a pound, and a sirloin steak $6.80 a pound.

The best selling 1963 Chevy Impala cost about $26,600.

At Blum’s in San Francisco, not an expensive restaurant, you paid $12.46 for a hot turkey sandwich, $13.75 for a chief’s salad.




To: puborectalis who wrote (751092)11/4/2013 9:04:13 AM
From: Brumar891 Recommendation

Recommended By
TideGlider

  Respond to of 1578214
 
High Deductibles Chase the Middle Class from Health Services

By Joseph E. McIsaac

In a recent conversation, a good buddy enraged by his new private insurance premiums and $5,800-per-year deductible said something that struck me as undoubtedly prophetic.



"I'd literally need to be dying before I would start paying this ridiculous deductible for routine care."

Under ObamaCare, those who work for a living incur massive premium and deductible increases to subsidize those that cannot or will not provide their own insurance. In the universe of ObamaCare, unless you are among the privileged dependency class that enjoys free health care, gone are the days when cautionary calls can be made to the doctor because a child has a stomachache or bad cough, because such calls will cost you five hundred bucks or so.

As with so many utopian policies of the progressive Left, ObamaCare is rife with unintended(?) consequences that inflict pernicious pain and damage on society.

When Ideology Trumps All

In December of 2009, Mark Steyn adroitly warned, "Democrat operators ... know that what matters is to get something, anything across the river, and then burn the bridge behind you" and that single-payer, government-run health care is "the fast track to a permanent left-of-center political culture."

As recently as August 12 of this year, Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid openly confirmed Steyn's prediction that ObamaCare is but a stepping stone toward achieving the ultimate goal of the progressive left: a single-payer system.

Now that the Obama administration has rolled out its self-proclaimed "single greatest achievement," some hard facts are finally becoming known about costs and sign-up counts, even as the government fights tooth and nail to prevent such disclosures. And for good reason: Medicaid enrollment is soaring, and new paid policies are almost nonexistent.

Financially, Obama looks to be much worse than a train wreck, but progressives don't really care about money. It's all about the ideology and getting everyone over that bridge.

Insurance Industry Suckered

In a world where government has a true monopoly over health care, there is no role for private insurance. If the bridge does get burned and socialized medicine realized, it destroys the private insurance market and drives insurers out of business. Yet faced with the very real threat of legislative extinction, the insurance industry seems oddly insouciant and compliant with the law.

So what gives?

When asked why insurers would willingly participate in a law that ultimately threatens their business, Dr. David Hogberg of the National Center for Public Policy Research explained, "At this time, the insurers are attracted to the individual mandate." He added that the industry also believes that "f ObamaCare fails, the left will say we need single-payer. However, making that argument is going to be tough. Single-payer is talked about, but it is still just talk."

Regarding last Wednesday's meeting of the CEOs of the largest private health insurers at the White House, Dr. Hogberg clarified that "the meeting was called by the CEOs to discuss the pathetic enrollment of less than a million [newly insured in the exchanges]." (Little did anyone know but the number is actually in the hundreds to date, not millions.)

Given the revelation that only six people nationwide successfully signed up on day one using the exchanges, there is good cause for the industry to be alarmed. Millions of existing customers are being canceled, and if the exchanges cannot function to quickly re-sign enough customers, the industry faces a tremendous collapse in revenue. No doubt progressives gleefully see such a collapse as an opportunity to nationalize the health care industry, but unlike in 2009, there is no chance that such a seizure would pass Congress today.

ObamaCare Driving Premium Hikes

Obamacare compels insurance providers to offer policies that meet robust minimum coverage protections, cover patients with pre-existing conditions, and provide free or subsidized coverage for the uninsured. Contrary to the innumerable promises of the president to the contrary, opponents of the law predicted that premium costs would soar, and indeed they have.

As this CBS News report documents, even the least expensive new plans (the so-called "bronze level" plans) are extraordinarily more expensive than comparable existing plans.

In this report, a young lady rails against the costs of her new ObamaCare-compliant insurance coverage. Her previous policy cost her $199 per month with a $1,500 annual deductible ($3,888 total before 100% insurance coverage kicks in). The closest matching ObamaCare plan will cost her $278 per month with a $6,500 annual deductible ($9,888 total before only 70% coverage kicks in). That's a 252% increase between the plans, and she is still on the hook for 30% of all costs thereafter.

When asked whether the government had any influence over the pricing of health care premiums and deductibles, Dr. Gosberg was unequivocal. "Absolutely. As with states, [ObamaCare] has insurance commissioners that approve the ratings, and there is a time when the government and industry negotiate a price schedule back and forth."

When asked to explain the drivers that resulted in such huge increases in premiums and deductibles, Dr. Gosberg broke down the fundamentals. "Under ObamaCare, you cannot underwrite based on health status. You cannot discriminate between men and women. ObamaCare exchange community ratings are one of the biggest drivers to cost. In free-market insurance, community age ratings range from 1 to 5, youngest to oldest, with the oldest expected to cost five times more than the youngest. In ObamaCare, the ratings only range from 1 to 3. Any insurer with a brain sets premiums for the oldest and works backwards, so the young pay more than they would in the free market."

There is little doubt that the Obama administration and its supporters will begin to blame the private insurance industry for any and all ills brought on by ObamaCare. It's what they do, and since neither George Bush nor the GOP can be effectively blamed, the evil insurance corporations are the likely scapegoats.

It's important in the face of the coming PR attacks on insurers to make clear that the soaring costs are to be blamed solely on ObamaCare, as are the millions of policies being canceled.

Recognize that the next time you twist an ankle or want an aching back checked out, ObamaCare's tentacles will be in your pocket, dissuading you from seeing your doctor.

Simply put, ObamaCare, via massive deductibles, discourages people from seeing doctors when they otherwise would have in the past. That is, unless the people are among the privileged dependent on the government, of course.

Read more: americanthinker.com
Follow us: @AmericanThinker on Twitter | AmericanThinker on Facebook



To: puborectalis who wrote (751092)11/4/2013 11:16:50 AM
From: longnshort1 Recommendation

Recommended By
TideGlider

  Respond to of 1578214
 
CIVIL RIGHTS LEADERS REACT TO VA DEM LT. GOVERNOR CANDIDATE REFUSING TO SHAKE OPPONENT'S HAND

National civil rights leaders reacted to Democratic candidate for Virginia Lieutenant Governor Ralph Northam refusing on camera to shake hands with his Republican opponent—right after confirming that he wants to massively expand government healthcare and not denying allegations that he thinks traditional Christians have no right to act according to their traditional-marriage views.

Dr. Alveda King—the niece of Martin Luther King, Jr. and one of America’s most prominent and respected civil rights leaders—said in a statement to Breitbart News:

I was saddened to learn today that Lt. Gov. candidate Ralph Northam refused to shake the hands of his opponent E.W. Jackson at the end of a television debate. I am deeply burdened by the loss of civility in politics today.

As one who has been elected to office as a Democratic Georgia State Representative, served as a Republican presidential appointee and who has often voted as an Independent, I have often said that we would all be better off without the political squabbles that tend to divide us. Refusing to shake hands with your opponent in front of a television audience takes the loss of civility to a new low. I would hope that his refusal to shake hands had nothing to do with the color of his opponent’s skin.

In a troubled economy, people are looking for leaders who can bring everyone together to solve the problems that confront us all. It is my hope that in these last hours of the race, Ralph Northam will recognize his inappropriate behavior and offer an apology to E.W. Jackson and to all those he hopes to represent.

Dr. King’s reference to skin color is because Northam is white, while Jackson is African-American.

Ken Blackwell from the American Civil Rights Union—who has been elected to public office more than a dozen times and also received presidential appointments and Senate confirmations to several federal offices—also offered his reaction exclusively to Breitbart News, saying:

The Founders of the American republic understood that democracy only works when both sides can at least be civil to their opponents. Virginia voters need to decide if that disqualifies Ralph Northam from being lieutenant governor of the Old Dominion.

People sometimes accuse politicians of being two-faced or insincere when they refer to bitter opponents as “my good friend” and pose for smiling photos with them. It’s not deception; it’s basic courtesy and respect, without which democracy cannot function.

In many countries, disagreements over policy end in brutal government oppression or even bloodshed. Politics can be so passionate with people clashing over views that an essential element of building goodwill and finding common ground is by working overtime to be courteous and complimentary. Unfortunately, Mr. Northam’s actions fall short of that important standard.

Virginia’s top Democratic candidates Terry McAuliffe (running for governor) and Northam have portrayed themselves as pragmatic centrists who are happy to reach across the aisle. But this video shows Northam won’t even reach across his chair.

After a lively debate, at 6:30 in the video, Jackson—the Republican candidate for lieutenant governor—attempts to shake hands with Northam, who will not shake it and doesn’t even look Jackson in the eye.

At first, a viewer might give Northam the benefit of the doubt that somehow he doesn’t see the extended hand. But Jackson dispels that doubt by taking his outstretched hand to tap Northam on the arm and then re-extends his hand almost into Northam’s lap. Northam still refuses to take it.

This comes on the heels of the final debate topic: gay marriage. The candidates had just differed on expanding government-run healthcare through Medicaid, beginning at 4:09 in the video. Northam said he supports adding 400,000 Virginians to government-run and taxypayer-funded healthcare, while Jackson said it would bankrupt Virginia, so private-sector options must be developed instead.

At 5:29, Jackson—a former Marine and Harvard-educated lawyer who is also a Christian minister—said he welcomes in Virginia both those who believe in traditional marriage and those who support same-sex marriage but that Northam believes people who do not embrace gay marriage have no place in Virginia. (One of Northam’s relevant statements is linked here.) Jackson adds that he believes that there is increasing intolerance of devout Christians on this issue and that Northam’s statements suggest anti-Christian bias.

While one would expect Northam to quickly say Jackson is completely misrepresenting his position, he does not deny Jackson’s claim. Instead Northam says that he supports gay marriage (using the poll-tested term “equality”) and then reasserts that he thinks all of Virginia should support gay marriage.

Virginia’s election is this Tuesday, Nov. 5.