SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Non-Tech : Littlefield Corporation (LTFD) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Market Tracker who wrote (5344)12/9/1997 7:05:00 PM
From: T.K. Allen  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 10368
 
Larry Ellison CEO of ORCL took a paper loss of $2.1 BILLION today

WOW and DOUBLE WOW!!!!!!!! And here I am concerned about my "substantial" position in BNGO! Kinda puts things in perspective. You gotta know your company and believe what they are doing is correct (unless you are a short-term trader).



To: Market Tracker who wrote (5344)12/9/1997 7:07:00 PM
From: SE  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 10368
 
be utterly amazed, if BNGO ever saw 4 3/4.

This is what I am working on in my mind. What would cause the stock to drop below $5 after the call.

1. Not the professionals and arbs. If anything they might end up net short on this deal and will have to cover in the open market.

2. Not on fundamentals. The company will earn around .44 this year and my worst case scenario next year (assumes no new deals etc...) is .35. In either case, a stock price below $5 is unjustified.

3. Not the political games being played. Anyone that understands that game is buying on the news, not selling. There will be VGM in SC and BNGO will be right up at the top.

4. Not the new taxes. If anything, the machines will be re-set and pay-outs lessened to cover the new taxes. A tax generally is not paid for by the person paying the tax, but passed on to the consumers. This should be no exception and the cost of doing business will not suffer.

5. Not on TX outlawing public ownership of BNGO centers...it was overturned.

6. Not Supply/Demand. The new shares are already spoken for in that the stock has been shorted and will be covered with the new shares. Therefore the new shares have already been purchased and the supply pressure we would see we are already seeing.

7. ??????

The only reason would be that management loses their minds and starts to do bad deals and ruins cash flow. However, with 16.5 in the bank plus some and cash flow from operations, they would really have to stink up the place to cause that to happen.

I just don't see much downside. I guess I don't see it going below $5 period. Anyone else considering the potential downside? What do you see?

GO PACK GO!

-Scott



To: Market Tracker who wrote (5344)12/10/1997 6:05:00 AM
From: Gary K. Best  Respond to of 10368
 
Re: ORCL
Look at the number of shares that traded between 21 3/4 and 22 1/8. Pretty good support. I couldn't stand it and got some to see if a bounce happens. It was fun to watch.
Gary



To: Market Tracker who wrote (5344)12/11/1997 3:45:00 PM
From: WallStBum  Respond to of 10368
 

ORCL's trading volume of 171,827,296 shares today, easily became the most-heavily traded security in history.

Anyone for a dead-cat bounce?
MT


Bght 80 Jan32 1/2 calls at 1/4 for the hell out it. Besides, BNGOW has got me pretty accustomed to staring down the barrell of the gun so's I can watch the bullet traveling down the barrell.

PS - the above's a figure of speech. Wouldn't want someone thinking I've gone off the deep end.(gg)

dax