SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: koan who wrote (751665)11/7/2013 4:22:42 PM
From: Tenchusatsu  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1576823
 
Koan, you hide behind those with PhDs to defend your belief that breaking windows is "economic stimulus."

If that's the case, then you should have no objection to one of these PhD know-it-alls going around breaking windows. If anyone objects, you simply point to his degree and say, "Do you know how hard and how much study it takes to get a PHD in economics?"

Tenchusatsu



To: koan who wrote (751665)11/8/2013 9:10:39 AM
From: Brumar891 Recommendation

Recommended By
TideGlider

  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1576823
 
97 per cent of warmists cite a 97 per cent that’s false

Andrew Bolt–, Friday, November, 08, 2013, (7:36am)

Reader James on a deceptive meme that’s repeated by warmists with little seeming interest in the truth:

I have submitted this to ABC Fact Checkers.

Yesterday on the ABC Drum John Hewson said 97% of Climate scientists are in agreement. We continuously hear politicians, journalists and activists refer to this 97% consensus among variously either scientists or climate scientists. In the telling it changes from the consensus being that they agree that humans are causing global warming or climate change, or that they are causing dangerous climate change, or that they agree we need to drastically reduce CO2 emissions. Now of course it can’t be all of those things and I think it is about time someone set the record straight. Even President Obama is said to have tweeted “Ninety-seven percent of scientists agree: #climate change is real, man-made and dangerous.”

He tweeted that after the publication of this paper: Cook, J., Nuccitelli, D., Green, S. A., Richardson, M., Winkler, B., Painting, R., et al. (2013). ‘Quantifying the consensus on anthropogenic global warming in the scienti?c literature.’ Environmental Research Letters, 8, 024024.

However this appears to have been totally refuted with the following peer-reviewed paper by reputable people published in a reputable peer reviewed journal:


The 97.1 % consensus claimed by Cook et al. (2013) turns out upon inspection to be not 97.1 % but 0.3 %. Their claim of 97.1 % consensus, therefore, is arguably one of the greatest items of misinformation that has been circulated on either side of the climate debate.


Here is an abbreviated version of the press release summarising the above paper.

The truth about the “97 per cent” claimed by Cook:



Any time you here someone babble on about “97 per cent of climate scientists” you should conclude the speaker has no idea what they are talking about.

blogs.news.com.au