Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Non-Tech : Any info about Iomega (IOM)? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: KM who wrote (39160)	12/9/1997 9:27:00 PM
From: jwk	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 58324

Just a couple of quick comments after wading through today's posts -- lots of talk today about ORCL, but no addtional mentions of what was posted early in day about CNBC comments concerning Y2K pressures. Allan M., Frank D, other tech-heads-- any thoughts on how y2k concerns might impact IOM? They depend heavily on just-in-time-inventory for their manufacturing. How y2k compliant are their suppliers (and their suppliers' suppliers)? --particularly in the factory floor/embedded controller issue -- Is IOM y2k proof? If so, how do we know? If not, ......? And, since I'm sure many of you spent at least part of the day wondering...... the skiing was absolutely incredible today!! Powder up the whazoo and beyond-- AND -- IT'S STILL COMING DOWN!! gotta go back an do it all again tomorrow ( the fatboy powder skis will make their seasonal debute) Still long, Still Holding, Still Smiling, ...... Jack K.