To: Alighieri who wrote (752190 ) 11/11/2013 7:56:12 AM From: Bilow 1 RecommendationRecommended By Jorj X Mckie
Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1575757 Hi Alighieri; My interpretation is fairly similar to the link you presented. You gave a link to a write-up which was not peer reviewed and is not a part of science. But it was a story about the same paper I cited that was peer reviewed and published in Nature. As I've shown above, the real problem for mankind is global cooling, when the world's bread basket turns into a dusty desert. And the article above quoted a scientist mentioning that the CO2 just might be able to stop that: In the past, Earth's journey into and out of glacial periods is thought to be due in large part to variations in its orbit, tilt and rotation that change the amount of solar energy delivered to the planet, he said. But the anthropogenic warming on Earth today could override such episodic changes, perhaps even staving off an ice age , White said. The ice cores do not and cannot support CAGW theory because they're about the ancient past. The last 50 years doesn't appear in their data. So those papers provide zero evidence that man causes climate change. Instead they show (a) that climate changes even without man's interference, and (b) that the situation this past summer, when it rained in Greenland, is similar to situations seen in the Eemian. But the Eemian was much warmer than today and this warmth lasted thousands of years. So we can't expect anything horrible from Greenland any time soon. Instead, the article suggests that most of the sea level rise was from ice melting on the other side of the planet. But the ice cover on Antarctica has been growing, not shrinking, and it's now setting new all time records. -- Carl