Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Naxos Resources (NAXOF) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Kim W. Brasington who wrote (6805)	12/9/1997 10:44:00 PM
From: Anne Lamb	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 20681

Kim..liontamer has repeatedly said the results were coming in within hours..his last post tho really concerns me <read scares> he seems to infer that since we didnt get the results by 5 today then LeDoux may think the samples were tampered with? if so..HOW?? With all of the COC protocol..how could Led think that? some reassurance on this post would greatly ease my concern. thank you , Anne

To: Kim W. Brasington who wrote (6805)	12/9/1997 10:46:00 PM
From: Bear Down	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 20681

Thank you Kim, I guess your post was for the other threadsters because it really matters none to me. I was only postiing an article in response to someones request. I am not YET a believer in "the process" that "will forever change the precious metals industry". I reserve the right to change my mind

To: Kim W. Brasington who wrote (6805)	12/10/1997 1:00:00 AM
From: Larry Brubaker	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 20681

I don't understand how NASDAQ's threat to delist BB stocks which don't file with the SEC applies to NAXOF. To my knowledge, the delisting from OTC BB would then place a company on the "pink sheets." Isn't that were NAXOF trades now? Why would NASDAQ's actions with regards to OTC BB companies be a problem for NAXOF?