Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : 2026 TeoTwawKi ... 2032 Darkest Interregnum -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Roads End who wrote (103695)	11/14/2013 8:04:55 PM
From: Box-By-The-Riviera™	1 Recommendation Recommended By marcher Respond to of 217764

HO HO HO!!!! time for market forces and public information to act, in the old SI way. how ironic. if headway is made and i'm gone, you'll get the stuff. looks like the owners are not quite as they should be after all. let's see just what there is to see.

To: Roads End who wrote (103695)	11/14/2013 8:26:06 PM
From: Box-By-The-Riviera™	Respond to of 217764

if you have time on your hands.. you might want to dig a bit deeper given that delete. I have an odd feeling this is going to be on page two of the WSJ eventually.. merely as a matter of historical interest and how a once semi famed web site found itself in a very petty poor and question mark condition. deleting that post was not a good idea since it was all public knowledge stuff on the corporation. hey craig. write me a note dude. what's the deal???

To: Roads End who wrote (103695)	11/16/2013 8:52:11 AM
From: Box-By-The-Riviera™	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 217764

It was one person's fair analysis of just why SI can never be what it once was. Which is to say, the web is now more like SI once was, and SI is no longer that, nor can it be. If its been bought cheap, then like used construction equipment in Spain a few years ago, one can polish it up, grind some extra profit out of it, and that's about it. Maybe in a very small way like Jay buying up the garbage heaps of old mining claims, because those folks left money on the ground to be had. I of course would like to see the very special revamp that proves the foregoing wrong, not because I care after they've reneged on literally years of promises made to some of the membership (unforgive-able), but I like being surprised. Why they would delete that, is both ironic and beyond silly. If the delete came from the ownership on high, we have a very petty captain steering his own ship, and if it came from lower down, we have very clueless mid- shipmen running the engine room. Let's watch and brief <g>