SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Pastimes : Silicon Investor - User Site Discussion - Generally Unmodera -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: TideGlider who wrote (186)11/15/2013 10:05:12 AM
From: Brumar891 Recommendation

Recommended By
TideGlider

  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 1604
 
Pretty much every site on the internet sells advertising ... I don't even notice. But don't let the advertisers know that.



To: TideGlider who wrote (186)11/15/2013 10:21:56 AM
From: Bear Down  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1604
 
I take it you are one of his admirers
You obviously are clueless. Do i respect him and his intellect, yes. But we have disagreed at least 10 times more than we have agreed over the years.

Click on my profile and read my quote.....It is from way back in the days of SI Jill as the SIJail warden.

I remember your name from way back as well, just can't remember your posting or investment style but weren't you a friend and follower of Riley G ? Or has my oldtimer's disease effected my memory?

If you were, that explains a lot. if not, sorry for my being confused for it is not worth my time to go look for myself so i will just take your word for it.



To: TideGlider who wrote (186)11/15/2013 11:12:18 AM
From: Bear Down5 Recommendations

Recommended By
Dale Baker
JSB
Lahcim Leinad
Mario :-)
S. maltophilia

  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 1604
 
Just because Dimitry accused him doesn't make it a fact. I have asked Dimitry for clarification of the accusation but haven't heard back yet so I mam reserving judgment and at least giving the Dale the presumption of innocence until proven guilty. We haven't even been told services he supposedly stole. Or don't you believe in the Constitution and the basics of US law?

How can one steal something that is free anyway? My guess is that it was a quick and perhaps poorly written statement by Dimitry but I will wait and let Dimitry speak for him/her self.

Since so many people know me by my real name and have met me in person, you can bet your last penny if you accuse me of a crime, you'll be broke when I am done with you. And SI won't be happy with you because they would be forced to quickly implement a policy to deal with subpoenas when there is no learning curve for me to learn how to file them and extract all of your personal information to pursue you personally. If SI didn't want to release your info, it would cost them money to fight on your behalf and I don't see that coming from SI on your behalf. Trust me, you are out way out of your league.

Do yourself a favor and don't just parrot the allegations against Dale. Find out if they are valid before opening your pie hole. that's all I am asking of you. Dale's reputation is a good one here, even if I don't agree with him most of the time. Calling him a thief with no info on what he supposedly stole or any facts surrounding it is not only wrong and unnecessary, but actionable if not true.

Dale can't be here to speak for himself, and Dimitry hasn't clarified his statement so defaming Dale is cowardice.