Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Microcap & Penny Stocks : Rocky Mountain Int'l (OTC:RMIL former OTC:OVIS) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: TopCat who wrote (25431)	12/9/1997 11:32:00 PM
From: michael d kugler	Respond to of 55532

Wasn't Dean Moshova, one of the original OLPV supporters, the guy who put up the website? As I recall, the website didn't work well, at first. Click on a few of his posts on the original OLPV thread for some interesting reading.

To: TopCat who wrote (25431)	12/9/1997 11:44:00 PM
From: Just My Opinion	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 55532

TC: I disagree. No one MADE him do that..He did that of his own free will.. Now, if you want to say that in hinsight, he wished he didn't do it...well I have no problem with that.. Please don't excuse a mistake on his part with anything other than it was... a mistake on his part. al

To: TopCat who wrote (25431)	12/10/1997 3:53:00 AM
From: shades	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 55532

The big deal today was apparently the posting by Columbo of the addresses. I don't think this was a good idea and I think that Columbo, himself, wishes he didn't do it. Wishing you didn't break the law and escaping punishment for doing so are COMPLETELY different friend. But..... It was the company itself that made this information available...possibly because of a stupid mistake by the author of their website....possibly because they wanted it that way. In any case, the information being available was the company's responsibility, not columbo's. WRONG, the company did not intend for that list to be public, is exploitation of a known flaw to make that data public was VERY POOR judgement on his part, and may have been HIGHLY ILLEGAL, all I wanted was his train of thought on what he was thinking and proof of that (but not ILLEGAL proof at the costs of others privacy) and he still has yet to make me understand what he is trying to say, do YOU KNOW?