Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: tejek who wrote (753066)	11/15/2013 8:23:02 PM
From: bentway	1 Recommendation Recommended By J_F_Shepard Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 1584759

"Point is the economy is in a shit hole" I kind of agree with MM on this. The employment rate sucks, and it's not getting better. But, it's not Obama's fault. Everything we buy except for our food and energy is produced elsewhere. Bush triggered his Great Recession at a really bad time for globalized America. The jobs we do have here don't employ a lot of people, like old style manufacturing used to. When go to Home Depot, six of the checkers are scanners that have me do the bagging. Same with my supermarket. When I call my internet provider, I talk to a robot. This will only get worse for employees in America.

To: tejek who wrote (753066)	11/17/2013 3:38:53 PM
From: RetiredNow	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1584759

And here's your next pick for Fed…more of the same non-sense of bankers destroying this country and refusing accountability. ----------- Yellen Strikes Out Editorial of The New York Sun \| November 14, 2013 Vice Chairman Yellen’s testimony before the Senate this morning moves us to oppose her confirmation to succeed Chairman Bernanke at the Federal Reserve. We don’t mind saying it’s an odd position for us, since we have great regard for her capacity as a forecaster, her character, and her comportment. She displays none of condescension that Mr. Bernanke so often allowed to show (we once expressed surprise that he wasn’t held in contempt). What transports us into the opposition is Mrs. Yellen’s truculence on the issue of auditing the Fed. This came into view after a discussion of the central bank’s regulatory role. Senator Vitter asked about what he called “true openness” at the Fed. He asked whether Mrs. Yellen would support Senate 209, a bill introduced by Senator Rand Paul and known as the “Federal Reserve Transparency Act of 2013.” It is the Senate’s companion to the audit-the-Fed measure offered in the House by Senator Paul’s father, Congressman Ron Paul, and passed overwhelmingly on a bipartisan vote. Mrs. Yellen insisted that she supports “transparency and openness on the part of the Fed.” She claimed that in terms of the “range of information and the timeliness of that information, we are one of the most transparent central banks in the world.” That’s not only irrelevant but wan. She then declared that she would not support “a requirement — any requirement — that would diminish the independence of the Federal Reserve in implementing, and deciding on implementing, monetary policy.” “For 50 years,” Mrs. Yellen averred, “Congress has recognized that there should be an exception to GAO ability to audit the Fed to avoid any political interference in monetary policy.” She said she believes that “allowing a central bank to be independent in formulating monetary policy is critical to assuring markets and the public that we will achieve price stability, and I would be very concerned about legislation that would subject the Fed to short-term political pressures that could interfere with that independence.” Mrs. Yellen may be no different than Mr. Bernanke, nor than most, if not all, of the chairmen who have come before him. All the more maddening is the fact that the committee proceeded to drop the matter. Mr. Vitter surely gets the issue, or he wouldn’t have raised it and co-sponsored Senate 209. But his colleagues made no follow-up about the Constitution of the United States. Not one senator who serves on the Banking Committee stood up for the prerogatives of the Congress. What is the Congress, chopped liver? What needs to be confronted is the scandal of Federal Reserve independence. Where in the Constitution does it say that monetary policy is supposed — or permitted — to be independent of politics? If the Founders of America had wanted the monetary power to be given to a body independent of politics, they could have given it to the Army or the Navy or the Supreme Court. But they sat down in Philadelphia and gave the power to “coin money and regulate the value thereof and of foreign coin” to, in the Congress, the single most political institution in the entire constitutional system. So where in the world does Mrs. Yellen come off lecturing the Congress on the need for independence? It’s not as if independence and opacity have produced much in the way of results. The value of the dollar has collapsed to levels that would have appalled not only the Founders of America but the congress that founded the Federal Reserve. Even after rising a bit in the past year or so, the value of the dollar is still, at a 1,250th of an ounce of gold, less than half of its value on the day Mr. Bernanke acceded to the chairmanship and a shadow of what it was when the Fed was founded. Mr. Vitter speaks for a faction in the upper house that understands the need to open up the Fed to an audit. This isn’t only about, say, what gold it holds in its vaults. It also involves how it works, what its un-redacted minutes say, and what it has been doing overseas. These are not questions on which it makes any kind of constitutional sense to keep Congress in doubt. There is legislation before the Congress — introduced by the Joint Economic Committee — to review the record of the whole first century of the Fed. The right move for Mrs. Yellen would have been to welcome to this kind of inspection. The right move for the Senate would be to hold out for a chairman who is prepared welcome an audit. nysun.com