SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Non-Tech : Any info about Iomega (IOM)? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Naggrachi who wrote (39175)12/9/1997 11:42:00 PM
From: jwk  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 58324
 
>>I have as much decency as you have, TOM<<

Zead, Excuse me for butting in here, but -- remember that Tom provided us with graphic proof that he shoved wedding cake in his bride's ear. That's the kind of guy you want to get in a decency-slinging squabble with?! <g>

Allen M. re:urging KE and crew to seriously consider Jaz and Jaz2 pricing -- come on Allen, you know that's at least three of the top ten forms of entertainment at HQ Roy. These are marketing guys. They think, talk, and do more about pricing issues, market share, and margins than I do about snow.



To: Naggrachi who wrote (39175)12/10/1997 9:04:00 AM
From: Tom Carroll  Respond to of 58324
 
RE: OT? Query about, vs. recommendation of, shorting

Zead,

With the exception of a brief stint on the sidelines
in early 1996, I've been long IOM(G) since 31 December
1992. Nonetheless, I didn't tell the guy to go ahead
and short. Draw your own conclusions.

Happy trading to ALL.

Cheers, Tom (long IOM)


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News