Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Donner Minerals (DML.V) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Surething who wrote (1855)	12/10/1997 12:08:00 AM
From: Surething	Respond to of 11676

DEAR ASE INVESTIGATORS: You will see that comments about DML and NAI appeared on this thread only after the stocks started trading like crazy. "Mr Metals" made his post long after CYP, DML and NAI had traded significant volumes. This thread reacted to the trading. It did not initiate it. A lie built on a lie is still a lie. Clean up your own back yard before you mess up ours!!! Surething.

To: Surething who wrote (1855)	12/10/1997 10:02:00 AM
From: Big Shorty	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 11676

Surething - Yes, and remember that when people say that Canaccord or Yorkton are backing those deals it is not their money. They simply go out and find the parties to take down the placements. It generalities, it is public money that does the financings not house money. If you stdy the deals and their terms as they are announced you will note that whenever a Canaccord, Yorkton, Georgia Pacific (not meaning to necessarily single out these firms or to mean that they don't do any deals without B-Warrants) or other Vancouver firm does the deal there are B-warrants involved. But if it is Toronto deal B-warrants are seldom mentioned. That's where we perhaps seperate the speculators from the investors. Have you ever noticed that when you participate in a financing or IPO your broker never wants you to sell. If you ask him to sell the stock, he/she will usually try to convince you to stay in long term. I think that is because they need a window on the upticks to get their own and inhouse paper out before they want the public to begin a massive sell-off. As you know for years (until the internet and other electronic mediums arrived) the investing public were treated like mushrooms on these matter (kept in the dark and fed full of sh-t). Oh, how things have changed, and most likely for the good. Jim