Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Pacific Rim Mining V.PFG -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Quinn who wrote (8022)	12/10/1997 11:30:00 AM
From: DeplorableIrredeemableRedneck	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 14627

Good news yes. How the heck do we keep on top of insider trades? Does the TSE or governing regulatory body post them on the net? Darren

To: Quinn who wrote (8022)	12/10/1997 2:31:00 PM
From: Feline	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 14627

On the other hand, the analysts in Toronto probably aren't going to like the fact that the mineralized zone is deep and will require extensive pre-stripping. They also aren't going to like the fact that the lateral continuity of the several stacked zones is not good. They are also not going to like the fact that the deposit appears to have significant internal waste and if it has to be mined as an assay wall then costs explode. They also aren't going to like the fact that the climate in this area dictates that the leach solutions will have to be heated to keep the operation running year round. They also aren't going to like the fact that PFG only owns 30% of the holding company and cash to it will be several years after (if) production ensues. Different multiple for this. I think they may conclude that the resource may depend on silver prices to be a mine, as the economics, at these prices, appear thin. Did the VSE analysts ignore all these points or are they operating in a different segment of the market? I'm still looking for an opportunity to buy this doggie.