Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: 2MAR$ who wrote (755898)	12/3/2013 10:30:28 PM
From: joseffy	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1571039

Tell us about your hero Darwin, halfwit.

To: 2MAR$ who wrote (755898)	12/3/2013 10:32:55 PM
From: joseffy	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1571039

Lefty imbecile 2MARS pushes homosexuality and Darwin. Great combination, slimebag.

To: 2MAR$ who wrote (755898)	12/4/2013 7:25:31 AM
From: jlallen	1 Recommendation Recommended By FJB Respond to of 1571039

You're as dumb as Rat..... How many of those supposed Benghazis occurred resulting in the death of an Ambassador whose repeated requests for additional security were ignored? The answer is ZERO. Like President Zero. Nutjobs like you and your BDS and Fox News obsessions are one of the reasons this country is so f'ed up. The dereliction of duty attendant the Benghazi attack.....not the attack itself as the other Bush attacks you cite is the issue...and it IS real.....and it did result in 4 needless deaths. There is nothing phony about it... Your rant is an ignorant, fact free POS....just like you.

To: 2MAR$ who wrote (755898)	12/5/2013 6:48:25 PM
From: joseffy	Respond to of 1571039

Ten questions to ask your biology teacher about evolution. ............................................................................................................. Icons of Evolution ^ \| 2010 \| j. Wells Ten questions to ask your biology teacher about evolution. ORIGIN OF LIFE. Why do textbooks claim that the 1953 Miller-Urey experiment shows how life's building blocks may have formed on the early Earth -- when conditions on the early Earth were probably nothing like those used in the experiment, and the origin of life remains a mystery? DARWIN'S TREE OF LIFE. Why don't textbooks discuss the "Cambrian explosion," in which all major animal groups appear together in the fossil record fully formed instead of branching from a common ancestor -- thus contradicting the evolutionary tree of life? HOMOLOGY. Why do textbooks define homology as similarity due to common ancestry, then claim that it is evidence for common ancestry -- a circular argument masquerading as scientific evidence? VERTEBRATE EMBRYOS. Why do textbooks use drawings of similarities in vertebrate embryos as evidence for their common ancestry -- even though biologists have known for over a century that vertebrate embryos are not most similar in their early stages, and the drawings are faked? ARCHAEOPTERYX. Why do textbooks portray this fossil as the missing link between dinosaurs and modern birds -- even though modern birds are probably not descended from it, and its supposed ancestors do not appear until millions of years after it? PEPPERED MOTHS. Why do textbooks use pictures of peppered moths camouflaged on tree trunks as evidence for natural selection -- when biologists have known since the 1980s that the moths don't normally rest on tree trunks, and all the pictures have been staged? DARWIN'S FINCHES. Why do textbooks claim that beak changes in Galapagos finches during a severe drought can explain the origin of species by natural selection -- even though the changes were reversed after the drought ended, and no net evolution occurred? MUTANT FRUIT FLIES. Why do textbooks use fruit flies with an extra pair of wings as evidence that DNA mutations can supply raw materials for evolution -- even though the extra wings have no muscles and these disabled mutants cannot survive outside the laboratory? HUMAN ORIGINS. Why are artists' drawings of ape-like humans used to justify materialistic claims that we are just animals and our existence is a mere accident -- when fossil experts cannot even agree on who our supposed ancestors were or what they looked like? EVOLUTION A FACT? Why are we told that Darwin's theory of evolution is a scientific fact -- even though many of its claims are based on misrepresentations of the facts?