SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Wharf Rat who wrote (756255)12/5/2013 3:39:08 PM
From: TideGlider  Respond to of 1578370
 
The employees you mention are already being paid anyway. He won't do time and will pay court costs plus do a little probation. It probably wasn't the first time he did it and even if it was, if nothing was done to deter it, people would be taking every thing from cars to portable appliances there to recharge.



To: Wharf Rat who wrote (756255)12/5/2013 4:16:13 PM
From: Tenchusatsu  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1578370
 
WR, we can all agree that this is too much for "stolen property" that amounts to five cents.

But as electric cars become more ubiquitous, we as a society will have to stop taking electricity for granted.

That means, for example, the next time you charge your phone or laptop at Starbucks, you might have to ask for permission.

Tenchusatsu



To: Wharf Rat who wrote (756255)12/5/2013 5:21:59 PM
From: i-node  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 1578370
 
Suppose a person lives next door to a park.

Would it be acceptable then to run an extension cord to an outlet found in the park and routinely use that for charging the car?