Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : View from the Center and Left -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Sam who wrote (239488)	12/6/2013 3:07:15 PM
From: neolib	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 543697

It might be a bit more complicated: It was only after The Post called the state Health Department that Kelly said he got a call from a department representative telling him it had all been a mistake, and the baby could be covered after all under a family plan. The department would not comment on the specifics of Kelly’s situation or why it told the family three times that the baby wasn’t covered. It would only say, “All children in the family are covered under a family policy. A separate policy is not needed for the 1 1/2 year old child.” This is from the NYP article. It sounds more like he was talking with some confused individuals, and didn't have the brains himself to insist that something was off. Or more likley, I think he simply smelled a golden opportunity to get on Fox News when he talked with someone clueless, and made the most of it. After all, he could look perfectly innocent himself in the process, and get some good mileage bashing Obama out of it. Why not??