Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Naxos Resources (NAXOF) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: KRosenfeld who wrote (6865)	12/10/1997 12:40:00 PM
From: citydi	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 20681

Hi Everyone, Time to set your clock! Could someone give me a recent quote? Thanks, Citydi

To: KRosenfeld who wrote (6865)	12/10/1997 12:45:00 PM
From: Michael Donahue	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 20681

Ken I agree with your assessment that their should be a disparity in the numbers when assayed using the standard technique vs. the Johnson/Lett technique. I may be wrong, but I believe some time in the past year having seen numbers from the standard assay techniques which were rather unimpressive. I am not sure if these assay results were COC or not. Can anyone else support or refute my comments? MD

To: KRosenfeld who wrote (6865)	12/10/1997 12:45:00 PM
From: gene greg	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 20681

It seems very suspicious in this day and age,especially after readingall the information that has been supplied on this site. Going back to Sept 3,that nothing but rumors come from anyone including Mr John and Kim.

To: KRosenfeld who wrote (6865)	12/10/1997 1:21:00 PM
From: Jerry in Omaha	Respond to of 20681

Mr. Rosenfeld; You posted; "I would think that if the gold is attainable only after what Henry calls the shake and bake method. The pre-Johnson samples will be low, and the post-Johnson will have higher gold content. If the samples were tampered with, you would expect the results to be similar. I wouldn't think it possible to salt the dirt with anything other than your standard run of the mill gold. This control would be a very simple method to prove or disprove tampering. I would suspect that Ledoux is already doing this." An interesting "check" methodology you suggest. I wonder how many more checking techniques can an experienced researcher think of. I wonder what "certainty criterion" has been established. As I imagine the set of data points being accumulated by our eminent scientific staff I can only wonder where and when in that ever increasing number pile the necessary certainty finally will be achieved. Jerard P