SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : ahhaha's ahs -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: ahhaha who wrote (24164)12/10/2013 11:32:27 PM
From: frankw1900Respond to of 24758
 
"no, you loud mouth trouble maker. There's no possible limit to our spending". The repubs are quietly accepting this ultimatum. "We haven't got the votes".

They won't get the votes unless they clearly differentiate themselves from the opponents. They aren't doing that by making nice when the opposition isn't - that shows they don't have belief in their principles. Folk unconsciously pick that up and don't listen to them - don't take them seriously. And it stops the opposition from having to take responsibility for what it's doing.

BTW, finished Conard's book. I don't think I learned anything from it I hadn't learned here. But it's clear and reasonably short. Good gift to the nephew who I suspect is going to be bumping up against suits and money and the entitled very shortly.



To: ahhaha who wrote (24164)12/11/2013 6:05:07 PM
From: dvdw©Read Replies (3) | Respond to of 24758
 
As observers; Everything anyone wants to know is covered by this video which depicts two well trained parties each with years of training in the art of getting what each wants by relying on training and systemics. This is the most comprehensive evidence of the problem and demonstrates why reason cant prevail against obfuscation as circular reference.

Highly recommend watching it several times as the evidence of the tactics comes through...forward this to Levin and whoever else is tasked with communicating across purposes with someone skilled in their art.

Obvious conclusions occur when Plausible deny ability is shed, and subsequent actions which ultimately end up indicting all the previous dialog as a waste of time, depicting the complete sham of the underlying systemics of one party, and the cautionary warning about the impending breakdown of the other partys..
To: ggersh who wrote (98849)12/7/2013 8:39:39 PM
From: Pogeu Mahone2 RecommendationsRecommended By
dvdw©
John Chen

Read Replies (2) of 98906
youtube.com