Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : The Obama - Clinton Disaster -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: bruwin who wrote (90010)	12/10/2013 10:17:20 AM
From: locogringo	4 Recommendations Recommended By dave rose Honey_Bee John lorne Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 103300

I would, personally, encourage anyone to listen to the content of that speech and separate its contents from their opinion of the orator. On 1st glance, I would ask why? Why separate the words from the orator? Is that possible? Is this some new kind of game that now makes him not responsible for what he says since he is a confirmed liar? On 2nd thought, I would rather watch paint dry, but thanks for the tip/warning.

To: bruwin who wrote (90010)	12/10/2013 2:56:29 PM
From: GROUND ZERO™	2 Recommendations Recommended By John locogringo Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 103300

is it even possible to separate the words from the one who speaks them? If that could be done, then the words would be insincere... anyone could speak anything, but if it's not from the heart, then those words are just unintelligible babble? Aren't all your words directly from your heart of hearts? Should anyone care what you have to say if all you did was recite someone else's speech while you yourself didn't believe a word of it? I'm just asking... I appreciate your comments, let's have a legitimate dialogue... Thanks in advance... GZ

To: bruwin who wrote (90010)	12/10/2013 9:02:15 PM
From: Wayners	4 Recommendations Recommended By Honey_Bee John locogringo lorne Respond to of 103300

Delusional.

To: bruwin who wrote (90010)	12/11/2013 3:30:05 AM
From: Brian Sullivan	3 Recommendations Recommended By John lorne Wayners Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 103300

PHOTO DRAMA: Upset FLOTUS Switches Seats With Hubby at Mandela Memorial thegatewaypundit.com Posted by Jim Hoft on Tuesday, December 10, 2013, 1:50 PM Look at the look on Michelle's face and how chastened Barry looks after he's made to sit apart from the Danish woman: A photo drama played out in a sequence of pictures today at the Mandela memorial. Kristinn reported: The sequence seems to have started with Obama, Thorning-Schmidt and British Prime Minister David Cameron posing for a ‘selfie’, followed by Obama touching Thorning-Schmidt on her shoulder, then a glaring Michelle Obama, ending up in Barack and Michelle switching seats so that she is now sitting next to Thorning-Schmidt. Michelle was not amused… First lady appears to fail to see the funny side as her husband jokes with Danish Prime Minister Helle Thorning-Schmidt. Then look what happened… [ In the second pic, looks like she's rolling up her sleeve to whale on Barry. Barry has already crossed his arms and wiped the grin off his face ... he knows the boss is mad. In the third pic, she'd picked Barry up and switched seats with him. I'd like to see video of that happening.] Enough is enough. Michelle switches seats with her husband to separate the two. thegatewaypundit.com Not the first time she's put her angry face on toward some good looking woman: