Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Tenchusatsu who wrote (757324)	12/11/2013 3:13:13 PM
From: joseffy	1 Recommendation Recommended By longnshort Respond to of 1577917

Tenchusatsu --you really ought to stop the spamming. Repetition does not make your position any less absurd. Mandela was a terrorist.

To: Tenchusatsu who wrote (757324)	12/11/2013 3:27:04 PM
From: longnshort	1 Recommendation Recommended By joseffy Respond to of 1577917

so Hitler didn't create that violence in ww2 either, I see. mandela was the head of the ANC

To: Tenchusatsu who wrote (757324)	12/11/2013 3:29:23 PM
From: Blasher	Respond to of 1577917

in your analogy, Mandela was the leader .. like Bush. So, Bush did not create any violence ?? I agree about Bush, but Mandela actually did create violence. As the leader, he ordered the actual killings and terrorism. Now, Mandela did change . . but he never apologized for his past terrorism . . . kind of like Dorn and Ayers.

To: Tenchusatsu who wrote (757324)	12/11/2013 5:44:58 PM
From: joseffy	1 Recommendation Recommended By longnshort Respond to of 1577917

Mandela the Communist ............................................................................................................... americanthinker.com By Bruce Walker December 11, 2013 Nelson Mandela was a Communist. Although most people think that is not important, it is the very essence of who he was. He never denounced Communism. He never apologized for embracing Communism. He never exposed the soul-destroying nature of Communism. In this Mandela was like Mugabe, the horrific Marxist leader of Zimbabwe, though he was not grossly evil like Mugabe. Was Mandela a Communist because he needed Communism to end the Afrikaner white rule of South Africa? No. Communism was not needed to fight the very real racist legacy of European colonialism. In the former British colony of Rhodesia, Bishop Muzorewa in 1979 was elected prime minister of Zimbabwe, and this black Methodist clergyman was accepted by whites and blacks. In 1980, the Communist Mugabe, using extreme violence and intimidation, forced new elections, which he won, and Mugabe, the butcher, has been in power for the last thirty-three years. Bishop Muzorewa represented all that we could have wanted in a black political leader. He visited Israel in 1983 and urged Zimbabwe to establish diplomatic relations with that nation. Muzorewa went on a hunger strike when Mugabe began driving out all political opposition. Communism is also one of the worst things to ever happen to Africa, and as Muzorewa showed, it was utterly unnecessary to black liberation. Indeed, the vast majority of the victims of black African Communist thugs have been their black non-Communist opponents, as tormented nations like Angola, Ethiopia, and Mozambique have shown. What is even more perverse about the Communism of Mandela is that the National Party of the Dutch Afrikaners, the champion of racism and bigotry against the English white minority and their Union Party, were enthusiastic Bolsheviks. As I relate in my book, Sinisterism, which ties all the "nasty little isms," as Orwell so well put it, into the same clear group, the white supremacist Afrikaners supported Bolshevism from the beginning. General James B.M. Hertzog, the leader of the Nationalist Party, said in a November 1919 Pretoria address that he "warmly commended Bolshevism to the public. I say that Bolshevism is the will of the people to be free. Why do people want to oppress and kill Bolshevism? Because national freedom means death to capitalism and imperialism. Do not let us be afraid of Bolshevism. The idea itself is excellent." His deputy, Dr. Daniel F. Malan, on January 23, 1920, at Vryburg, said: "The Bolsheviks stand for freedom, just like the Nationalist Party." In 1922, the Nationalist Party formed a "United Front" with the Communist Party and the Labour Party. At the Nationalist Party Congress in 1923, which confirmed a pact between the Labour Party and the Nationalist Party, Malan again proclaimed the two to be "squarely opposed to capitalistic and monopolistic domination and exploitation of the people." Full Story