SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: simplicity who wrote (757508)12/12/2013 5:47:30 PM
From: i-node1 Recommendation

Recommended By
simplicity

  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1576401
 
A pretty good question if you ask me.

One might even ask, "What are you doing as president of the US to begin with?"



To: simplicity who wrote (757508)12/12/2013 6:08:21 PM
From: tejek1 Recommendation

Recommended By
Don Hurst

  Read Replies (4) | Respond to of 1576401
 
Other than its blatant unconstitutionality (and John Roberts be damned), the most pertinent current question regarding Obamacare:

Mr. Cheney is responsible for starting a senseless war where many American lives were lost and a small fortune spent and lost. You are idiot for using him to support your case. In fact, you have lost the argument. Bye bye.



To: simplicity who wrote (757508)1/1/2014 6:18:33 PM
From: joseffy1 Recommendation

Recommended By
FJB

  Respond to of 1576401
 
NYT: ‘We had a reporter on the scene talking to the attackers during the [Benghazi] attack’

Twitchy
Excerpt:


David D. Kirkpatrick @ddknyt
@RichardGrenell we had a reporter on the scene talking to the attackers during the attack- still invaluable

Richard Grenell @RichardGrenell
NYT reporter says NYT knows who Benghazi attackers are > @ddknyt: we had a reporter on the scene talking to the attackers during the attack
8:45 PM - 30 Dec 2013


What’s that? The New York Times had a reporter on the scene of the Sept. 11, 2012 terrorist attack in Benghazi, Libya? Reporter David D. Kirkpatrick, who wrote this weekend’s piece on Benghazi, says it was invaluable to have a reporter on the ground talking to the attackers during the attack.


<excerpts from twitter comments>


Chris Loesch @ChrisLoesch
"Talking to the attackers during the attack..." Was he giving them tips? Taking a poll on YouTube videos? Just standing by? Wow! @ddknyt

S.M @redsteeze
@ChrisLoesch This might be overly snarky but it's dead on dude.. What is a NY Times reporter doing embedded with US Embassy attackers..Huge


Nino @baldingschemer
@redsteeze not to mention- how does one embed with a random, spontaneous protest sparked by a video? what luck @ChrisLoesch


Richard Grenell @RichardGrenell
@robertcobrien @ddknyt @nytimes @BradThor what is the ethical line for a journalist? Just watching a US Amb being attacked by terrorists?

Kris Kinder @kris_kinder
@RichardGrenell It must be ethical to wait 15 months before everyone knows a reporter was there. @robertcobrien @ddknyt @nytimes @BradThor

S.M @redsteeze
@flyoverangel question becomes is NY Times protecting identities of attackers of US Soil to source information for their paper @DarrellIssa


Article


So - Did the NYT really have a reporter embedded with a "spontaneous" attack, a reporter that the paper has kept from helping the investigation for over a year, or is Kirkpatrick making stuff up on the fly to make himself look important? Either one's believable to me. (An NYT reporter on the ground would actually give some credence to the "video" theory - he probably showed it around the bazaar hoping to make a news story.)