Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Royal Oak-RYO -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Eric Freeman who wrote (548)	12/11/1997 12:41:00 AM
From: roger fontaine	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 1706

Eric:I agree with you,Michael is short,he has given us words with nothing to back up his claims.He made claims on another thread about RYO;s Giant mine, stating that their costs were over 360.00 for the past 3years.This statment is false.1995 costs were 329;1996 were 357 and due to cost cutting measures 97 are suppose to be appr.325.00 per oz.Michael,YOU get your facts straight before you start spreading unfounded rumours.It is true that the grade is low and RYO may be over estimating somewhat but 360.00 is ridiculous.Where are his facts to back up his statement that the 40M is not forthcoming.This is the first person that has posted here that I say we ignore.I may not agree with some comments ,however,they are your opinions,you may have yours just as I have mine,but to outright lie will not be accepted.In Michaels post he does not state these are his opinions,he states them as if they are facts.Well plain and simple,they are false unless he can prove otherwise.