Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: tonto who wrote (757751)	12/14/2013 2:39:55 PM
From: koan	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1575858

I wasn't wrong, you twist things e.g. you act as thought bennies are different than crack. How so? They are both speed. Tell me what I got wrong. You cannot say someone got something wrong and then not tell them what it is. You right wingers do that a lot. You cast aspersions and then don't back them up. Because you can't. I have her history on my side and can keep throwing it at you. Just give me a target. I am confident she is every bit as horrible as I stated.

To: tonto who wrote (757751)	12/14/2013 2:52:52 PM
From: i-node	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 1575858

>> If you had studied her for 50 years as you claim, you would not be wrong so often. This claim is an obvious lie. Koan does not hear views he opposes, which is obvious from the fact that he has many of us [opposing voices] on ignore so he does not have to respond to our questions. And if you put him in his place often enough, he'll have you there, too. So it is not the slightest bit credible for him to claim he has "studied" Rand for 50 years. It is a lie.