Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Politics of Energy -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Land Shark who wrote (44968)	12/17/2013 7:41:56 PM
From: Thomas A Watson	Respond to of 86356

Let us check the personal opinion of the fish brain. This is your personal assessment and the science doesn't agree with it, period. No amount of repeating the same drivel ad nausem will change that.

To: Land Shark who wrote (44968)	12/17/2013 7:49:19 PM
From: Maurice Winn	Respond to of 86356

The science does in fact say that plants do better with more concentrated CO2 than in the homeopathic levels before the industrial revolution, and that they require less water. That means less irrigation. It is not a personal assessment. I have never measured those things myself and have taken botany scientists at their word. I know myself, from direct observation, that insects, bacteria and all non-flora life consumes plant life [directly or via eating animals that do eat plants]. The science on the food chain is in the settled science realm. You would find 100% agreement among scientists. Mqurice