Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: TimF who wrote (758797)	12/20/2013 4:08:26 PM
From: TimF	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1578743

North Dakota did well in terms of income growth for people already living in the state, and for people moving in to the state, but not so much in terms of people who already have high income moving in to the state. FL turned around strongly to the negative at the end of the period covered above, and after that time frame, mostly a matter of booming too much and then dropping hard off the boom, and also a matter (for at least central Atlantic coast FL maybe not so much a statewide issue) of the end of the Space Shuttle program. LA was affected a lot by Katrina. CA has over the last year done a bit better then before, but updating the chart would still leave it with a net negative. Most states would have very similar results for 2000 to 2013 that they had from 2000 to 2010, possibly even FL, with the earlier positive outweighing the later negative.