Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Research Frontiers (REFR) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: poccidenarri who wrote (7809)	12/20/2013 9:04:40 PM
From: N. Dixon	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 50411

No regrets. Believe or not you have become the reason many are now bullish. Stock is up 63% for the year, most of that since the Q3 conference call said profitability in 2014 Q3 is a SAFE bet, meaning income well before then. Fund managers are on board. Institutional buying has tripled and Goldman and Douglas do their due diligence. My cousin runs several biotech funds, I know the extensive research they do.. Sorry Asensio, you have no credibility anymore (I assume he reads this board since you all wanted me banned for life for giving the link to asensioexposed)

To: poccidenarri who wrote (7809)	12/20/2013 11:14:39 PM
From: Kevin Podsiadlik	3 Recommendations Recommended By Jorj X Mckie Lahcim Leinad poccidenarri Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 50411

Honestly I have trouble fathoming her cognitive dissonance. How does she not get that most if not all of us would have lost interest in REFR by now if she didn't insist on kicking hornet's nests of shorts? Even if you assume she's being deliberate about it and she knows perfectly well that she's lying about her role in keeping REFR well-bashed, I have to think by now that Harary and co. would be better off if she would just shut up. It's not like there's been a real short squeeze in this stock in ages, so having us around really doesn't do them the good that they think it does.