Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Manmade Global Warming, A hoax? A Scam? or a Doomsday Cult? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: 31Floors who wrote (3461)	12/28/2013 2:49:20 PM
From: longnshort	Respond to of 4326

why did they photo shop it ?

To: 31Floors who wrote (3461)	12/28/2013 3:29:33 PM
From: Maurice Winn	Respond to of 4326

The subject was not CO2, but the dishonesty of the Global Alarmists. When people are dishonest, it's because reality does not suit their purposes. The subject of the picture was the smoke coming out of a chimney, which in the case we are discussing was steam, not smoke. The dishonest Global Alarmists were pretending that the picture showed soot. It's unlikely that they were simply ignorant photographers. Did you really think the subject was CO2 and did you really think readers don't know that CO2 is an invisible gas? Mqurice

To: 31Floors who wrote (3461)	12/28/2013 5:04:47 PM
From: Jorj X Mckie	1 Recommendation Recommended By longnshort Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 4326

I thought the subject was Co2, which FYI is odorless and color less so you may want to clarify what you just wrote. The subject was whether or not that stuff coming out of the stacks is black. The stacks at a coal fired plant have very few aerosols. It is mainly H2O and CO2. And it isn't black. It is white...it is steam. So why did the authors of that article use an altered photograph? And why did you choose to post it?