SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Evolution -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: LLCF who wrote (44515)12/28/2013 11:17:27 PM
From: average joe  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 69300
 
Yep, an expert on everything from starting range raised colts under saddle to exploring for gold on Mars.



To: LLCF who wrote (44515)12/29/2013 1:02:01 AM
From: average joe1 Recommendation

Recommended By
Solon

  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 69300
 
Yes, and he's completely clueless about other religions as well, although he's not afraid to talk all about them... dunno that that is any different than other topics though I suppose.

I think the "Brummar tangential Move" is essentially a child-hood coping mechanism gone awry, and he uses it because he just can't stop himself from conversing about things he knows
little about.

I just realized why Brumar dislikes Socrates. Socrates was the wisest man to walk the face of the earth and admitted that he knew next to nothing while Brumar declares the opposite.

It is possible that Brumar is a reincarnation of Melitus who made the false accusation against Socrates.

Like Melitus our Brumar is just jesting to...
What you say, O Melitus, is incredible, and, as it appears to me, is so even to yourself. Indeed, O Athenians, this man appears to me to be perfectly insolent and intemperate in his speech, and to have in reality written this accusation, impelled by a certain insolence, wantonness, and youthfulness. For he seems, as it were, to have composed an enigma in order to try me, and to have said to himself, Will the wise Socrates know that I am jesting, and speaking contrary to
myself? Or shall I deceive him, together with the other hearers? For he appears to me to contradict himself in his accusation, as if he had said, Socrates is impious in not believing that there are Gods, but believing that there are Gods. And this, indeed, must be the assertion of one in jest.



To: LLCF who wrote (44515)12/29/2013 9:58:17 AM
From: Brumar89  Respond to of 69300
 
On the contrary, I'm one of the few here who know anything about any other religions .... I recall you not knowing the difference between Taoism and Buddhism and thinking both of them have swamis who can "bi-locate" and levitate.