Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : American International Petroleum Corp -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: taxikid who wrote (5733)	12/11/1997 12:42:00 AM
From: JT	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 11888

<please check this link> Taxi, Thanks for the link. I did a bunch of surfing tonite for AIPN and Millenium. Went over most of the press releases since the beginning of the year. Specifically, take a look at this release provided by Millenium when they were hired by AIPC to initial a "national PR campaign" in order to attract investors and broker coverage: fast.quote.com My thoughts regarding Millenium now are that they are being paid by AIPC to not only attract institutional investors, get brokerages to cover to stock, help with any aquisitions, but also to attract AIPN investors via the Internet. I think their basic problem is that we call them and get differing statements each time, "no comment", or their "opinion du jour". That drives people nuts, us, them, everyone. My personal opinion is that they need to take a more professional and courteous stance when dealing with ALL investors, provide us with consistent and clear feedback, dump the opinions, and make darn sure they don't "hold back" material information from the public. As I stated before, I believe that the Soviet seismic analysis is complete. If so, release the goddamn results - good, bad, or same! The ONLY reason I can think of for not releasing it is if CEO Faris believes that it's release could adversely impact the ongoing JV discussions for the shareholder. And I don't see how it could. Starting another line of conversation, isn't it interesting to note that only the western half of the concession has been evaluated, not the eastern half where the Chikuduk structure is located? Do you think that AIPC might be evaluating the western half in order to sell it off, and use the proceeds to develop the eastern half which has Chikuduk in it? Seems resonable, doesn't it? Regards, JT