Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : American Presidential Politics and foreign affairs -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: RMF who wrote (68566)	12/31/2013 12:47:23 AM
From: LLCF	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 71588

Comparing spending money on social program and those wasted wars is like apples and oranges.... the guy is clueless. Further, the defense budget, essentially spending against an imaginary boogie man under the bed for decades now, is similar to a deluded addict spending all sorts of to keep flying monkeys from invading his estate. DAK

To: RMF who wrote (68566)	12/31/2013 3:40:36 PM
From: TimF	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 71588

Can you clarify WHEN the previous precedent for deficits was set. For war time deficits - During the Revolutionary War. For sustained peace time deficits - Under Hoover and FDR in the 30s The costs for Iraq and Afghanistan were pretty stiff, so I'm wondering how you can say that "social spending" was a bigger contributor to the deficits during the Bush years than those two wars? Because they where bigger, and not just bigger but much bigger. Total spending in 2000 was $1.764 bil. Total spending in Bush's highest year was $3.518 tril. The increase per year was more then the amount spent on the wars during all of those years. That assigning 2009 to Bush, when really the transition year's spending are partially the result of the outgoing president and partially the result of the incoming president, but if you use 2008's $2.9tril the result is still the same, only a fraction of all that extra spending went to the wars. In 2009 Entitlement spending (all of which is social spending was $1.636 billion. "War on Terror" Spending was less than a tenth of that, and entitlements do not include all social spending. The Department of Education spent another $45.4bil, Health and Human Services spent another $70.4bil, Hosuing and Urban Development $38.5bil, then you have a portion of Agriculture's $20.8bil, and of Labor's $10.5bil, and some more money from other parts of the budget. Or to look at it another way. Defense (not just the war on terror spending, but all DoD spending) went from $281bil nominal ($354bil adjusted for inflation) to around $660bil. That increase of $379bil nominal) is much smaller then the increase in social spending, and that's counting the regular defense budget as well. If you just count the war spending then the increase is around $150bil (for a years spending) vs a total increase of about one and three quarter trillion dollars (of which over half is social spending).