SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Winstar Comm. (WCII) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: David Krafcsik who wrote (3116)12/10/1997 9:32:00 PM
From: SteveG  Respond to of 12468
 
<I suppose it depends on what kind of modulation scheme they are
using. It sounds like phase modulation, and I think they are limited to a set bandwidth by the FCC allocations, so they can't really change
that. They could always increase the transmission power to ensure
they had an adequate SNR (signal to noise ratio) for all possible
weather conditions.>

Communications isn't my forte, but I would have thought that power was more of a regulatory concern than bandwidth. And since I see WCII and others adding bandwidth almost monthly, I presumed THIS was the regulatory satisfying solution.

<The key point is that at 38 GHz the variability in signal attenuation due to water in the atmosphere is much less than at say 28 GHz. Hence you wouldn't have to pump as much power through (means smaller power transmitters) and you probably wouldn't need as much dynamic range in your receiver.>

Certainly makes sense.

<Increasing the bandwidth to handle different types of interference
sounds like a spread spectrum kind of approach. Is that what you
were talking about? I don't think they can use spread spectrum
because of the way these frequency bands are allocated.>

Not really spread spectrum - more FDMA. I presumed that increasing the frequencies, depending on what modulations schemes are or can be used, would allow better transmission through specific noise bands, without increases in gain.

But this was just a guess.

Thanks for the response. Were the other references of any interest - especially if GAIN is NOT a regulatory consideration, details on the GaAs PHEMT chip?

Regards-

Steve