SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Gold/Mining/Energy : Canadian Diamond Play Cafi -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: WillP who wrote (7588)1/1/2014 5:47:56 PM
From: Rocket Red  Respond to of 16207
 
I think you will be telling us :)))

998.7 2180 1244 813 549 283 198 111 49 23 7 2 0
best pipe

999.4 1132 971 602 407 215 130 65 28 13 2 1 0
second best

1001.1 na na na na 105 90 45 17 8 4 1
third

1000.8 906 652 429 283 171 92 31 15 7 3 1 0
last

thats as close as i'm going to come in guessing



To: WillP who wrote (7588)1/3/2014 11:48:28 AM
From: Letmebe Frank  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 16207
 
Will, here is my guess on the source for each sample. Thanks for putting this together.

Weight:
999.4 Winspear-Snap Lake?
998.7 Aber?
1001.1 Not sure why no micros for this lot. Maybe this was a winspear sample.
1000.8 Diamet??

LMBF



To: WillP who wrote (7588)1/3/2014 2:25:41 PM
From: WillP  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 16207
 
Here are some historical diamond counts for various deposits. They all pretty much weigh the same.

The challenge is: Estimate a grade per tonne and if you can, try to name the deposit.

Weight0.1060.150.2120.30.4250.60.851.181.72.363.354.72
999.41132971602407215130652813210
998.7218012448135492831981114923720
1001.1nananana1059045178410
1000.89066524292831719231157310

I'll give the answers later on....



And the answers are:
The first one is the 3,314 kilograms reported in mid-December for Kelvin. Its 0.85-millimetre-sieve grade was 3.45 carats per tonne.

The second one is the 569.1 kilogram core drilling test of CH-6, reported in 2009, which averaged 8.0 carats per tonne on a 0.85-millimetre sieve.

The third one is the 14.1-tonne core drilling test of CH-6 completed in December 2010. It averaged 2.84 carats per tonne on a similar sieve. (The diamonds from 0.425 to 0.85 mm are from the check sample processed concurrently.)

The final one is the 222-tonne surface excavation test of CH-6 completed in December 2013. It averaged 2.70 carats per tonne on a similar sieve. Again, the counts for the smaller sieve sizes are from the concurrent check sample.

Interesting, yes?

WillP