Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Canadian Diamond Play Cafi -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Rocket Red who wrote (7680)	1/3/2014 9:13:53 AM
From: Natedog	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 16213

I wonder if they have started to value the rocks from part 1. So happy that its not going to be a 6 month wait for values if the speculation holds true. Might be able to get an answer from the company once the 2nd set is out.

To: Rocket Red who wrote (7680)	1/3/2014 10:43:50 AM
From: WillP	1 Recommendation Recommended By Breccia Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 16213

OK, Gents. Earlier, I provided diamond counts four four samples weighing almost exactly one tonne. They are from four different tests of two different deposits. The actual weights varied, I normalized them to one tonne and then altered the weights by a kilogram or two just to throw you off. Only Rocket Red dared venture in, and even then he didn't venture a guess. He did nail the order of grade from best to worst, however. In a few hours I will reply to that post, indicating which deposit is which, and what the original samples were. It should be an eye-opener as to the variability (and margins of error) in not-so-small samples, and might even give you Chidliak optimists some cause for hope. (Not that you seem to need it.). Regards, Will